« December 20, 2009 - December 26, 2009 | Main | January 03, 2010 - January 09, 2010 »

January 02, 2010

here in the yankee republic
if we're white and 21

we live under a semi enlightened corporate despotism

where

our personal liberty is our mess of pottage

and our potus benign or malignant

is “their ” limited liability

rubber stamp doge

Posted by pinky at 02:42 AM

December 31, 2009

the spacial dimnsion to trade is one thing borders are another

most models simplify away borders as fast as possible
they become market merging models

where two formerly mutually isolated market regions are united by trade flows

usually all or nothing comparisons amount to such a model

but borders only come in as borders when one models profit max
now the limitation here

it's the state that uses the borders

ie by quota or tariff

what about trans nat firms eh??

notes on the invisible customs agents
——

now add in currency zones ….

if firms can build anywhere and sell anywhere
what sort of exchange rates tariffs and quotas might they design to maximize total profits ???

quite an algorithm that …eh ???

one assumption
firms interacting with bordered areas and currency zones

stumble on the advantages and dis advantaged they produce for themselves

the dis advantages get “worked off”

the advantages get worked “up”

Posted by pinky at 08:04 PM

market nature's groovey water flowing uphill self defiances

file this under half baked is maybe worse then raw


http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/renminbi-rx/



this is a blog post by nobel pocket giant paul krugmantel  (who seems to have become my de facto practice serve and volley back board these days )



this time he's throwing light and logic on the us vs china exchange rate fuddlement .







“Consider the real exchange rate “



RX = E(P*/P) 



where RX is say the dollars real rate of exchange against chinese products

E is the currency exchange rate ( here dollars over yuan d/y  )

P is china's  price level and P * the US  price level.



play around with this and you quickly discover what changes in any one or combo of these three variables

do to the real “dollar” exchange rate RX



here's krugs crucial example:

” appreciation of the yuan is a fall in E ”

( yuan up against d means d/y falls => a lower value for E(P*/P ) ie in RX

result a dollar buys less chinese goods eh ? just the thing to close a trade gap …maybe )

pushing along .. paul next introduces  some quaint vintage (18th century) dynamics AKA market naturalism :



“Basic international macro says that there is a “natural” level of the real exchange rate”


” determined by trade competitiveness and international capital flows.”

much magic in that ole pair of hats mates

” And the economy “wants” to get to that real exchange rate.”

are you shivering with mirth yet ??


“natural ” ?? “wants” ?? how arch of doctor paul it's as if he had satire in mind but hey he don't gang

he just speeds on completing his reification with this clincher :

“If you have a floating exchange rate you get there via a rise or fall in E …But if you have a pegged rate, there’s pressure on prices instead.”

get there where's there paul ? balanced trade balanced payments or some higher optimal meta-balanced balance ??

okay let him have his pretend time and yup if the formula defines the edges of this universe u can't get around it …either e changes or the ratio of p*/p changes .. and if you gotta change the p*/p ratio in a fashion to reduce chinese imports

and save our poor nell of a manufacturing sector china's p has to rise faster or fall slower then our p* no ?? 



(okay okay  SMBIVAers paul just threw baby 666 out with the ” adjustment noise ” but it's the holidays so let's continue

along in good cheer)





now that the basics are clear paul briars up the story some :



china is “deliberately keeping E higher than it would be under floating” heavens yes china IS foul pegging and foul pegging

so low so very un-naturally low shouldn't oughta naturally the great and powerful market forces impelling ” the formula “

lead ineluctably to higher prices in china eh ??

cause well by the formula by freezing the E ”.. China is creating pressures for P to rise” or i hasten to note P* to fall





to bolster his parable paul notices two other instances of bad pegs leading to price level pressure

one up : germany in 72 (then a forex fiddle dollar pegger albeit a relenting one unlike china today )

and one down : poor spain right now trapped inside the hideous euro vice and facing deadly deflationary pressures 

that done paul pulls the good feeling cake out of the oven with this “So China ..(by maintaining it's low peg ) ..is basically trying to keep water from flowing downhill. ” ya …so …well ummm paul err then we got a no sweat here right ?? China can't do that obviously i mean make water go up hill that's super natural err ahh but she's succeeding at this no ??? and has been succeeeding at this for a decade or more …



conclusion: something un natural has been hatched here a ways back and maybe not for the first time …so paul maybe

instead of silly just so cherry picking and formula facilizing u oughta let errr this un natural baby this 666 of a baby back into the bath tub and let it splash and glower at us like the fucking demon it is



so who's baby 666 ?? why He's ”the trans nat limited liability hi fi system “

that by a concatenation of sluices pumps cisterns and leveees

can make water flow up hill (specifically from north to south ) and keep it flowing up hill till…well till the moment comes when “letting spontaneous international market forces ” run their “natural” gap closing course is the better ” collegial “ 

trans nat run or pass option



headline:

there is no law of gravity for relative price levels

no law at least ”trans nat man “ in his diabolic ingenuity can't over come



moral of tale:

spontaneous market forces are not about to rescue our utterly shit kicked industrial sector



so i suggest paul put this RX= EP*/P fucker of a half baked cake back in the oven 

it ain't ready to eat till the fat trading profit demon now riding it

get's caramelizes away into brown drippings



then again no oven gets hot enough to do that does it ??



——————————————————————————————-


rx=e(p*/p)

this equation is harmless enough
as mere definition

the problem comes when it's functionalized

ie tied to trade say

as in exports and imports are a function of Exchange rate

with some specifications of real trade balance movements tied simply to exchange rate



this rx=e(p*/p)

is just the translator of price levels really

it holds by definition

which is not to say any specific functionality is implied

in other words the system can be stablized
in quite un natural gravity defying conditions

with a yawning gap in trade
” that closeth not ” in under a full generation

which god love it is reality and

clearly punks

krug with his wants and natures



paul

baldly throwing out this dynamic underbelly

with its natural rebalancing tendency

that operates like gravity

albeit whether “rapid enough” and unstop-able he leaves to a mind's own wants i guess

“Basic international macro says that there is a “natural” level of the real exchange rate… And the economy “wants” to get to that real exchange rate.”

hmmmm

such lovely level playing field restoring spontaneous re balancing tendencies of international markets ….do not exist in reality

and i suspect he knows that

since his nobel earning paper models such a system of internationally located “firms”

and how they are defying competitive self perfecting

even without using borders to “protect”

their price discriminating maximizes

the key is to focus on the motivations behind the counter measures that turn “market wants ” on their head


profits are purely dynamic ie transitional self liquidating incentives in a golden age market paradigm



yes profits are like the lone ranger

the righter of wrongs that rides off as soon as justice is restored or progress completed



profits the keenest of all necessary evils

the demon incentive that liquidates itself in the briefest possible time precisely because it can't styop itself till its devours itself

what could be more delightful



in iron age markets like we really got howeve

the profits are converted into quasi rents and by this institutionalization

given “extended life”



the best way to view the trans nats ??

they exist in the interstices

like invisible customs agents



they set up where markets meet each other

they use barriers and doors to their liking

and as a well schooled ring

of oligopoly players

they use technical and market “access”

price discrimination protectionism and its opposite free rape zoning

as best they can

every trick in the book and its opposite



of course there are rival moments and unclear ” state sponsorships “

can lead to “frictions”

it is a pandemonium after all



however its really the attempt by rogue nation states and liberation forces

to thwart the trans nats rocky reign

that pulls the privateers together

honor among thieves



of course a strategic competitor state

rising up like the very devil himself ….agin uncle's global pax …



i think of china building that harbor city in baluchistan

under paki auspices 

as a strategic node linking  a future pipe line from china 

thru paki ville to the very door step of the oil region

naughty naughty



perhaps the han fiends great game counter move

most NOT to uncle's liking

Posted by pinky at 07:38 PM

December 27, 2009

krugman circa '96

Posted by pinky at 03:12 AM

censored at smbiva ??

“After some initial dismay at what has been called, somewhat unoriginally, “Climategate” the reaction amid progressive circles – 99 per cent inhabited by True Believers in anthropogenic global warming …”


that hyperbolic doctor benway like spurn comes from this weekends painted screed of alex C and he's at his best

i think



in fact the catamount of whoville the panther of mauve paddy land is always at his best standing straight and tall

and throwing bolders down at the rest of us progressives albeit in this case blindly like polyphemus …ah but with

his usual suave dare i say edwardian panache eh ??





yes alex is attacking those crafty corporate submariners silent running right past all of us green pwog gulls 

what's got to be the biggest hoax since that bright spring sunday morning in jerusalem …..



i know i know why oh why must he take such a crazy out there position … this madly pwog defying stance over

my god

…CLIMATE CHANGE  of all apple pie left” issues “ why that one ??



i'll tell u why …. because it' my dear pantying humanist tree and beetle loving simps is his scorpion moment

yes he's chance to self destructively sting and sting savagely the great docile green amphibian creature

on who's back he regularly rides …the “99%” of us rads …..yup this is the quintessential cockburn

so love it or leave him to the hounds of Hell inc



a savoury for you:



“the CRU emails graphically undermine the claim of the Warmers – always absurd to those who have studied the debate in any detail – that they commanded the moral high ground. It has been a standard ploy of the Warmers to revile the skeptics as intellectual whores of the energy industry, swaddled in munificent grants and with large personal stakes in discrediting AGW. Actually, the precise opposite is true. Billions in funding and research grants sluice into the big climate modeling enterprises. There’s now a vast archipelago of research departments and “institutes of climate change” across academia, with a huge vested interest in defending the AGW model. It’s where the money is. Scepticism, particularly for a young climatologist or atmospheric physicist, can be a career breaker. “





imagine anything more delightfully topsey turvey i can't godess of hoakim bless this montebank

he's  a pink yorick still wearing his lips…. for that let us be thankful

Posted by pinky at 02:31 AM