« February 22, 2009 - February 28, 2009 | Main | March 08, 2009 - March 14, 2009 »
March 04, 2009
|
what 's good for the gooseamazes me folks the credit system only works against the little guy the answer is not to abolish it examples of the long chain of class grifts ——— the gist of a pure credit system is this balance sheets can be change in an instant native americans may have had a phase of awe and fear mixed with hatred about the white man's fire sticks but soon enough … Posted by pinky at 03:13 AM |
|
an old favorite trashed.....i'm a heel after allgoodwin's model the wagery hogs if you believe the direct producer is best modeled the extractor of value and the humble point wage funds so confession for the record: in grad school back in the bogus end of the 70's having the profiteers generate labor saving tech
Posted by pinky at 02:29 AM |
|
model misery“the models economists have been using do, in fact, help us find answers to some important questions. “ really ??? like what ??? monetary policy you “think” u may have volcker did the heavy lifting lets go back to identity politics i prefer stilted tautology as dogma … buiter go ahead alfred eat the peach i think the question u need to answer for yourself come on the wage price spiral was a serious problem in the late 40's full employment meant something like niaru or nairu come on peace time full employment again why was the main stream playing why the love of monetary macro late vickrey macro pre dates this catastrophe and when the call to arms came too bad no new york commune will come out of this routing our academy ain't ” If the Fed could credibly commit to inflation at rates higher than the 2-ish percent target it’s already believed to have, that would be effective.” that is high octane new k think its inside out string pushing magic act its hoodoo but if some one said oh we can make that a fact ie that would be late vickrey and insane
meant this we can manage effective demand thru upping household credit purchases as easily as uncle only the fallacy of that is obvious two points are typical corporate objectives nominal wage control this left to spontaneous market forces the greater the shift in income shares but where's the hostage where's the collateral a scheinvert prone house lot does the trick
no but it prolly does mean the list of existence proofs so to speak so what
absolutely nothing beyond the possibilty of another course of main stream research so why wasn't it if policy ignored them are we to believe the leaders of the profession i doubt that where is the big time economist prepared to gasp “my god i've wiasted my career i've failed totally no way and the rules said assume this system is stable forever leave catastrophes again “When things are going well, the opportunity costs of survival strategies appear unreasonably high.” nice point macro oughta have quite a contingent of life boat specialists
Posted by pinky at 12:30 AM |
March 03, 2009
|
more on lots moremy peerless leader Okay so mr and. Mrs sprawl We'll skip metal And go straight for land As a store of wealth house lots are a pip Now
no longer The tale obvious starts and ends Its ultimately link to its use value of course which itself partakes of the intricacies The rent or its interst payment equivalent Conjecture: The episodic undulations So how do we construct a quasi raft a mortgage on our lot's market value no risk as if the mortgage principal is market value adjusted Posted by pinky at 06:41 PM |
|
repeated notes to a fooldo u feel like the second shoe don't wanna drop ?? Posted by pinky at 06:39 PM |
|
The legado of this laputa is of course any global city economythe hi fi system circles market earth from above but not Posted by pinky at 06:37 PM |
|
people's fedToward a peoples fed
There are about I figure Interest payments at a high 7 percent would be Now obs 50 billion plan to modifying the principal on some fragment But why not think bigger
The household mortgage A gubmint bank that loans money The key meme here is See a mortgage on the full Now uncle can borrow for free so he can loan for. Free to facts scatter shot
From seasonal vacation homes to mobile homes, housing units in the United States increased from 124.4 million in 2005 to 128.2 million in 2007, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The number of occupied housing units went from 108.9 million to 110.7 million. Posted by pinky at 06:34 PM |
|
soak it up now then what....??? later the sponge burst and ...help my fellow klavern members
when and why i note fear of reduced purchasing power per currency unit inflation??? are we talking future fiat savings here or a liquidity sponge that can soak up more much much more some old crows need to try a new caw or two “forced lowering of savings” given our present perilous poise at position zero that notion makes sense to me ….sinister sense but what's the play can the sudden out pour of civilian money holdings get absorbed how is a revival of spontaneously increased effective demand on wanted when it comes Posted by pinky at 06:26 PM |
