« April 27, 2008 - May 03, 2008 | Main | May 11, 2008 - May 17, 2008 »
May 09, 2008
|
extend unemployment benes ??extend the period ??
then the eureka “Compared with the $152 billion price tag t'is the scrooge as pragmatist in him
black swan dear soul this is a macro econ con blog not a home economics blog uncle sam has as much money
u jay are a constant very well know ….zero i'm indulging a tic here folks
its a stock measure okay so the fed likes to gesture towards but this is about social conditions here i suspect hey ultimately the national scale of our fellow enlistees yes the drop out rate …
laf if y were a pug Posted by js paine at 01:41 AM |
|
systemic risk and secondary uncertaintymark apparently i'm not as impressed with this piece
“One cannot escape the feeling that many players understood what was going on but happily went along.” “Underpinning this whole process is a view that sophistication implies quality: a really complicated statistical model must be right. “ that's silly “the importance of management” the old guard recalling the last crisis the explanation hiding behind the regress of okay so timing the inevitable panic is impossible so cutting the gordian knot for regs so what elsethe players go back to the old black magic all this is big stuff even if u keep your eyes on the dealer's hands ————- “Indeed, the current crisis key word “pretty” timing the turn no one had the means to accurately time it was all come gain Posted by js paine at 01:24 AM |
May 08, 2008
|
wage control index vs the people's cost of country livingbuying a house ??? how to factor in the house beyond the car tv pc bath tub but you don't buy any of them so …. notice … indeed look what fruit it bares… ” The purchase of a durable good like a home is not a consumption purchase” pat s i know you don't read my stuff cause of its format the core rate is a proxy for unit wage costs oft repeated proposition: the ultimo purpose once the fed;s aim is absorbed the cpi politics ??? hey what would you have it be ??? jesse: that's the superficial glib daily paper take seasonal flux ??? food prices and energy prices aren't season in and season out the underlying rate of inflation proxy??
about jesse: “Your explanation @ 10:43 is the clearest and most correct of all the comments here, including the post itself.” here's the nugget of truth in that claim: ” A change in the value of the home that is not accompanied by a change in rental rates does not change someone's Cost of Living ” hold on to that tightly you might not need to justify your take on wage control is fed policy sine qua non all else is eye wash ” some argue as if again jesse: you're right at least in my case ndd your wit is so dry here its micro managing but its necessary general rules and regs needless to add btw **** Posted by js paine at 09:03 PM |
|
uncle marty strikes fools goldmarty wants to do all them
default enough defaultin' key lineby marty : “What is missing is action to prevent positive-equity mortgages from becoming negative-equity mortgages” this is why made patent eh ??? the big boys want to prop lot values despite the doctor mavro to the rescue facade this is about wealth saving the scare words little home owner to wit : “The federal government … get the gig ?? yup its a “full recourse” deal all right ” Homeowners would be in effect translation marty speaks for some very crafty bastards Posted by js paine at 08:03 PM |
|
i see says the blind man as he staggers down the hallhow does jay do it ???
his own petard: comes in a logic tweeeezer variety too Posted by: paine | Link to comment | May 07, 2008 at 11:03 AM paine says… these are old bromides indeed i like but i liked it back in 1979 too was that too soon or is this too late Posted by: paine | Link to comment | May 07, 2008 at 11:09 AM paine says… to axe this Posted by: paine | Link to comment | May 07, 2008 at 11:13 AM paine says… goes back to the truman GI bill years let me suggest this the old politics pre pearl harbor well from growing golden wheat fields change without change Posted by: paine | Link to comment | May 07, 2008 at 11:21 AM paine says… why rp ??? “It just seems like a choice as to whether or not you want to send your money to the bank or to the government, and it appears as though most U.S. citizens prefer supporting our banking system.” fabian forte
paine says… nice way to put this indeed through through the collusional forex gimmicks Posted by: paine | Link to comment | May 07, 2008 at 11:50 AM paine says… you may my take on the location to be fair to tp that is an overall net shift tp the result point one was never in doubt point two
“The important point is that the tax laws contributed to a culture/climate in which people believe they are stupid if they don't own…” tie in ??? okay that induces a desire to own perhaps this irrational grail quest
but an accelerant ???? if a forest becomes drier do to say climate change … in this case the tax holes are conditions a cleare use of accelerant might be care free because of the brave new world
but you are indeed still the real bubble maker and the killing of of the deduction scams even as they remain like err the farm subsidies need removal hey parallel city the cult of bio fuels Posted by js paine at 07:52 PM |
May 05, 2008
|
child of angles” strengthening efforts to reduce inequality and insecurity” now if the job class can be polarized you know and of course yes always remember in the public discourse maxim blah blah key keep expanding its all about the rest of us Posted by js paine at 09:34 PM |
|
paul k sez maybe this ain't the end times for wall street's leveraged to liberty leaps“Cross your fingers, knock on wood: i think paul k he'd so much like but alas a return to normalcy even amidst a lowering recession the people's light and fireworks show but then again hope beats eternal ”..there’s every reason to believe that the next crisis …” like an early 50's brooklyn dodger fan “wait until next year “ ———— comments blis: “Krugman gets the analysis completely wrong, because he seems well once again blissex ”…completely wrong” ?? first obviously paul's point besides hell my sig-other that to the side blis your very intense insurance is not banking paul calls it needed banking regs —i personally like
( the thought crosses my mind but your point about spot ON bro btw next you'll be refuting yourself have you bliss boy now you have to race around ———
If not our collective goose is cooked “ seems there's always time for a late arrival from these must be austrian ovens ??? its always purplexed me why things must always get bigger why the inevitable final knock out finish and if there's a way to ameliorate the shock not always the hundred year flood cometh indeed it cometh we build the levy higher till what the levy collapses of its own weight
Posted by js paine at 08:20 PM |
|
next fall we face a choice ..a grave national choice“ANY president will have to repair 8 years of severe damage to the very fabric of the Republic” what in hell meaneth this mate severe damage the patriot act hey till white folks fear their own gub iraq?? both sides of the aisle will find a way that one deemed best the mounting federal deficits ??? pure black widow spider horse feathers the downed wires of 50's era bi partisan
i for one am tired of 30 years their hysterics their indignation its upshot any one but an elephant eh ??? peog ponders sorry now if it dosn't …. even flight deck pappy Posted by js paine at 08:19 PM |
|
larry s produces peas“The domestic component of a strategy to promote healthy globalisation must rely on strengthening efforts to reduce inequality and insecurity” larry on homeland front : strengthen job lose safety nets sum up the international front ?? “the US should take the lead in promoting global co-operation in the international tax arena” “prevent harmful regulatory competition”
the result more waiting larry u'll have to do better then this which is ???? “we feel your pain
“pushing us towards a one world government. ….” come now win larry but win “Internationalists
precisely why ?? cause … exactly correct and larry even states it boldly stateless (careless) elites and he goes further the “groundswell ” is based on in the rapidly
“employment is going to shift to exports (at greatly reduced real prices)” you lost me on this bruce talking real terms of trade ??? but looking at corporate earnings even if (dollar based ) but that's the econ con in me… “There is plenty of policy space to cram-up “ boy oh boy are u right and i love your list of means “.. to make the top 2% and major corporations absorb a lot of the pain” well worth repeating Usury laws
Posted by js paine at 08:13 PM |
