« April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008 | Main | May 04, 2008 - May 10, 2008 »
May 01, 2008
|
may day the workers holidaytrade and jobs “the use of tariffs no the exchange rate pattern needs to be addressed the whole cross border cross currency zone system unfortunately none of this exceeds the science we know “The convergence of trade and technology has been disastrous” why assume technology played any role beyond u are dead right
btw the switch to low wage asia
one large enough yes this could employ so long as production the whole relative wage biz most college vs hs wage diffs empty of any underlying bed rock sweep away any tendency of the system trends in non trade sector wage rates i agree blaming it on immigration is nonsense the counter beyond a popular demand is a full employment macro policy at best only far far grander take the region from western penn and ny the rust bowl eh??? now snap a picture of it ” u in 20 years or less ”
it will precisely be the unequal contest and by this i mean the unequal exchange rates the trans nats and their security holders the euro is way way over valued “capitalism and its free market mentality will NOT protect redundant labour from extinction. The social safety net came into political acceptance, as result”
you don't get muy point perhaps its all about the set of newly emerging jobs made possible check out steel or auto parts or hand tools well rusty can wax up this roll call yes the assault on wages came from several directions …. ” Are the ratios of graduates to non-graduates the same in 1973 as today” my crit of bivens dean baker why blame the professional class yes professionals may be snatching but lets unite and increase the earned income share not yet btw a lifting of the minimum wage “the poor and vulnerable “ god i hate sob mate poor vulnerable the white yankee wage class …. “In terms of immigration, it has been the major factor in the destruction of unions in the building trades and in meatpacking” building trades ??? but meatpacking … shit no room for alibis
wait till the mexicans “don't see why balancing trade they are meldable indeed exchange rate drops then theres the pecuniary incentive and most important so it's “What instruments are you planing to use to get us there?” quota threats jawboning won't do it obviously a strictly chinese aimed trade containment policy so of course u set up a metric will any conceivable i doubt it “an economist's Theogony, where abstract principles wage war: “Skills” “Globalization” “Technological Change” are the new gods, anthropologized agents, who keep our masters anonymous.” lovely bruce only a true devil a master class flack “a stateles elite “ ……. wjd123: “Doesn't competition taketh Is this supposed to be a joke? he's eating lunch but bruce i sure hope he's joshing us here if not
Posted by js paine at 06:21 PM |
|
authority always wins if the class tasks ahead then isn't subordination even the vanguard needs internal organization…hierarchy don't like hierarchy ? if its just too much for u to bare ” class emergency emergency Posted by js paine at 03:10 PM |
|
more ...more ...more delongeursmy my my file this inder 'deliver mine enemies unto me ' brad has broken the light barrier here this is possibly as wooly it parties with the neo lib creed … lower real rates investment may be btw could a certain level of house lot mortgages … “At some point this becomes unsustainable” as the car reaches 40 miles an hour we ain't any wheres near if there's production slack spot off delong … what can a poor man say perhaps if so … no it doesn't … Posted by: paine | Link to comment | April 30, 2008 at 08:17 PM paine says… and i and my gang of lawless resolutes beware the great shift of the tax shaft … the whole cross border trade system i must say the con's on u guys that anal fear of inflation
nope they are all equally free the conservatives are rock of ages types … look lets get this intergenerational gig straight the payroll tax is now in the future the income tax will pay some its a tax base to tax base time shift the real game … what the devil could “much poorer” mean ??? given our now trinary i'd allow the use of “somewhat poorer” …. Posted by js paine at 02:12 PM |
April 29, 2008
|
mea culpadani don't want ever circling lap after lap ever and always turning in my case hard left ps Posted by pinky at 12:57 AM |
|
uncle open your fiscal gap wider please ...much much wider“It will amount to no more than shifting yet another huge pile of debt onto the huge pile our descendants will have to pay off” this is simply wrong swells as for the here and now don't confuse raw commodity surges noe asume the price level is adjusted those alleged aweful options Posted by pinky at 12:38 AM |
|
trade gap blues... union dues ...pointy headed protection and regulation rackets ??What the heck was happening since 2001? the deficit was way too small for fiscal thrust mind experiment if all the tax cut money i say”yes indeed” uncle has unlimited credit
but protection and reg waves “less opportunity “ for who ??? the non lib 77% ??? surely our demanding and exacting however “”Significant labor law changes will likely start with the elimination of secret ballots for union organizing elections, so that unions can verbally “ask” workers if they would like to join (read: intimidate them into saying yes). Then may come repeal of the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act provision that allows states to enact “right to work” laws – 22 of them have done so – that allow workers to take jobs even if they decide not to join a union.” repeal taft -hartley ??? man oh man but the cotton state stymie if they'd like to dig their way out Posted by pinky at 12:33 AM |
|
party onput brand momentum aside the party ballot contest its an act of construction not discovery fiction ??? why not the side wins ritual…entertainment …emotional outlet ahh what simple if as often harmful as useful… fun what good sport as much Posted by pinky at 12:31 AM |
|
does karl actually shake the invisible hand ???famous pasage : “This sphere that we are deserting, within whose boundaries the sale and purchase of labour-power goes on, is in fact a very Eden of the innate rights of man. There alone rule Freedom, Equality, Property and Bentham.” Freedom, Equality, Property, because each disposes And here's his mephistos paraphrase of smith's ” and just because they do so, no as if ..here has karl missed the point ??? failed to capture the existence of a pareto optimality the sweet harmony produced by
the interacting of ego centric agents more in our next med moment Posted by pinky at 12:09 AM |
April 28, 2008
|
model muddlesOn leaving this sphere of simple circulation or of exchange of commodities, which furnishes the “Free-trader Vulgaris” with his views and ideas, and with the standard by which he judges a society based on capital and wages, we think we can perceive a change in the physiognomy of our dramatis personae. He, who before was the money-owner, now strides in front as capitalist; the possessor of labour-power follows as his labourer. The one with an air of importance, smirking, intent on business; the other, timid and holding back, like one who is bringing his own hide to market and has nothing to expect but — a hiding. mark i wish you had time for more such more like …well delong at his most boorish take the straight off implications of this line: “… I wonder if monetary policy will slowly run out of rigidities to exploit ..” my take and its in fact its ten million sticky quantities exist too at the phenomenal level and yet my deeper sense of the 'ting ooon sack' as much as irrelevent the contradiction embedded in the system the non optimal by the book guidance improve info on purvasive a sudden wave of the after math sorting out more and better info more and better forecasts face it the systems dominant players
what i don't see to wax 1848 ish the step by step from crisis to crisis assume the can openner and damn it “best possible markets” job markets and credit markets certainly true figuratively at least ie in and of themselves
bravo “… the asymmetrical information problem is intractable for unique products and long-term relationships” i prefer the simpler the shut out class …
but not of production or of …money …
answer : ” Not if our models are correct. In fact, this would be desirable” reason: ” If all prices are perfectly flexible, result : ” there would be no need for the Fed to intervene to stabilize the economy” i attempt to attack social policy is this below quote
“vulnerable agents are unable to protect themselves adequately, creating real pain. These effects are generally ignored as trivial, but they are not “
it ain't just SSI indexing
—ie putting aside the prole bottom does better relatively speaking of course and in the royalists' the wind that calls itself price system relies on relative prices not absolute prices if there's some spooky moving floor price shocks like crude oil presents from time to time wanna insure the system don't touch off a market anti inflation program “Bidding up prices to hedge inflation this is at best a very x ray telescopic a sudden reinforcing craze sure” the equity “ in fact who's to say then again a ten year so where does this lead us ??? “A healthy economy who ever did flow-chart ?? err a healthy economy sure no way and so your omni flex capacity thank god … for u there is no careful if mysterious workings there's an older school of course
—-even as it remains
————— example : my favorite part … case in point the great war inflation of 1915- to 1919 … ” The economics of the op-ed page, financed by the plutocracy, with its simple-minded “smaller government” and “lower taxes spur growth” is completely ass-backwards for our moment: progress from here requires higher, more progressive taxes, more social insurance, more public investment, new institutions to manage every thing.” it occurs to me but this time a national post industrial recovery act i see tattoo shouting ” it's the plan boss …the plan “
Posted by js paine at 11:43 PM |
