i just finished
reading
your up to date
on the two decade
people's china saga

and
like all prior updates its sub title might be :

"red china goes further into the capitalist dark ages"

i won't quibble with the facts
of your narrative
nor the super imposed
set of
what imply

to me at least seriously self conflictng social values

or
anything else
implied
by the
various
rhetorical twists and turns
you use to shape your report's message

what i wonder at is very simple....
the motivation for the fucking piece

who are you writing this for
and
who are you writing it at ???

what of the class struggle itself is here ???

you seem to prefer to count the corpses

a guy like me
could read this and think

fuck i'm reading falooon gonzo here

(or whatever that crack pot
manhattan directed cult's called)

have you ideas how the han people might restore socialism ?

are they in print ????

that type of piece
is not as likely to appear
n the corporate press ..

where as the one you tell or better retell here
sure could
---with a little jargon trim ----

fortunately i know you're not out to aid
the amerikan empire
since
there's no chatter about
" recently accelerated arms build up "
or
"the rise of great han chauvinism"
or
"poor little tibet"
or
"glowering across the straights"
or
" dreams of a spratly island oil rush "

so i should be thankful for that ...i guess

------------
apres my e

back thoughts:

this ass apparently taught in china

he has a whole whirllee gig
about the fake brand markets
and the endless parade of street hustles underway

god how aj liebling could have brought these glorious
flash and filtch points to life

nothing like a pb rad
to despise individual
enterprise
if it ain't kosher

all too
pb human
attempts to
great leap
out of a
very onerus
human conditionsthis guys implied regret

"too bad they can't all ....
be
teachers
and nurses
instead "

i suspect
if he had a choice between
being
a red guard
or a street con
he'd prolly
just wanta
shoot himself instead