New Cities/New Soviets

November 13, 2004

D&G Pickles



"Comrades"
    Deluze and Guatarri,

(those overfed
  cheerleaders 
for the revolution)

  mistake motivation for desire,


and therefore never get beyond
   ponderous discussion
      of the
"motivations for revolution"


regular  Dr Phils
 in spooky robes,

   they're
ersatz clergy
  offering only more alienation.


---------


The axiom
that "the masses can be made
  to desire repression"?

   Only a priest

 would inflict 
the stigmata of facism
     on desire.



Deluze and Guatarri are preaching original sin...


***FASTBALL--STRIKE ONE***


-----------


After this  ghost story, 
  they figure the
    marks are
  softened up enough,


they transition from
   shock and awe
        to
     shuck and jive,

more witch-doctors than play-popes..




Their "big finding"?
  The totem they offer
 to protect us
     from the
         disfigurements
    of facism?


These gizmos   
    they call
  'desiring machines'

and these miraculous 
   little doo-daas
 turn raw people-juice
      into the 
    the rainbow of social history.


(and you're already crawling
   with them, you just
  gotta use them)
 
Their miracle switch
   can make worldly
       the naive,
     "ethically invest the socius"

  and anything else
    you can think of, 
 up to
   and including
      taking
             a difficult shit
           for you.       
 


***THAT'S THE PITCH***


and it ain't
       anywhere near
    the strike zone...


  (how the hell can you
     use something with such
  vague parameters?)
    

A "desiring machine"
    is like
   a motivation, but
     spooked up
   and with lousy controls...


Do motivations produce human behavior? (yes)
Does human behavior produce the revolution? (yes)
Wouldn't you like to know 
   how to produce the revolution? (well...)


by the time 
  the discussion
 gets this abstract,
    we're
   spooked out...


***WILD PITCH--COUNT IS 1-1***


----------


D&G never fail to point out the
    implicit   danger 
 of desire
    "folding back on itself,"

     short-term
   motivations no longer serving
     the overall process of production,
        becoming either


    irrelevant, disruptive
  or worse, encircling 
     and controlling it entirely:

    decadence, addiction
       and totalitarianism,
     artifices gone rancid.


Their safegaurd?

  "making oneself a body without organs"

     (what a disgusting phrase)

     While withdrawal
 to the body may be the appropriate
    counter to encirclement
  to the Kapshow's spooky trip

  (I prefer bull lee's "silence,
      silenct
    and the sanity drug apomorphine")


Deluze & Guatarri
 mash down
   desire into the machine

fusing
   desire (the unique)
     and
  motivations (the disposable).


The combination
  makes their 
    "desiring-machines"
   a tragedy,  
 both
    impossibly precious
  and unable to survive.


***STRIKE 2***


-----------


Such a simple thing as desire is uncorruptable!


First of all, it serves to follow the rigors
  of need:  what do we eat?
     where do we sleep?  when do we have sex?
  these concerns guide our
       social interaction 
 to a degree that should
      not be surprising to anyone.



The motivations for revolution
  are equally simple:

 denial of comfort
   and security
 is
   the basic operating tenent
       of wage labor.



The aim of labor
  is to support and sustain
     human life.
But this is a long-sighted
    view -- arial (or sattelite)

and here  "in-country"

 shorter-term imperatives
   take over from
     the geist of
   "total human improvement"




D&G pose: if our motivations are structured by
  capital's market,
and if this artifice gives desire its dominant form
    in our real world,
  does the only hope lie in
     a radical mutation

     (a "break-through of 
  the desiring-machines")

 allowing us to fly
    directly past the state-form?



Thier whole formulation is preposterous,
   something hastily squirted out
     under the bedsheets
    of social democracy.



***STRIKE THREE AND YOU'RE OUT BOYS***






Posted by Sam at November 13, 2004 04:36 AM

perhaps the notion of internal contradiction
helps here

the active conflict that reconstructs
discontinuosly
motivations
but thru a spontaneous ever in motion
inner struggle of oppositions
we are never free of
both desire and loathing
no matter the target
even jesus

Posted by: meat me at November 11, 2004 05:58 PM

yes, but
that's for next
post

Posted by: sam at November 13, 2004 08:43 AM

means justify ends ?

no

but means modify ends
as means to ends go

Posted by: meats feet at November 13, 2004 01:03 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?