Recent Entries
maybe FED EX needs a few local tune ups
180 million jobs are you 25-35 with a BA ??? we go no where NY teacher creature combine pastees' triumph near the votes are in what in hell does that mean join to brake..... brake to join nyc librarians make the brake away
Archives
June 2006
May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 |
October 26, 2004red bantus ?under construction guest shot for black eye ===================
lets see here
what this
big shot union bantu's
sez his unions up to
===================================
comrades , brothers and sisters,
To understand COSATUs position
on globalisation,
you first
have to understand
our overall approach to the union
movement
COSATU has long adopted
what we call
social trade unionism
or
what others call
transformatory
or
revolutionary trade unionism
---- sounds mighty, maaaaan --------
We are not
and have never been
a narrow gumboots
overalls or wages union
-------- show me don't tell me maaan ---------
COSATU was formed
in the middle
of battles
waged by our people
against the tyranny
of the apartheid system
We understood
that we couldn't be successful
in improving conditions at the workplace
without first contributing
to
the broader liberation struggle
of our people
against racist tyranny
Informed by the lessons
of our history
COSATU knew
that it could not fight
and
win
by just uniting workers
against apartheid
We had to form
broader alliances
with a range
of
political and social movements
Today
on that basis
COSATU
is part of
the tripartite alliance
formed between itself
the ruling African National Congress
and
the South African Communist Party
It is this Alliance
that led the united front
against apartheid
and
finally won
the struggle for democracy in 1994.
Because we know
that workers
are members of the society
before they are workers
we have sought
to integrate
their struggles at the workplace
with those of our communities
It is these forms
of struggles
that over time
developed the capacity of COSATU
as the all round movement
that is the true voice
of the marginalized
We have led
struggles for
decent houses
access to electricity
and
other basic amenities
side by side
with the need
to pay workers a living wage
and
for improved working conditions
Informed by this history
in the past ten years
of freedom,
we have taken forward
this form of trade unionism
Whilst we maintain
the tripartite Alliance
as the key platform
of
engaging with the transformation
we have
at the same time
sought to build coalitions
with a range
of other civil society formations
It would be very difficult
for any conservative government
in the future
to isolate COSATU
because we are integral part
of
the society
We believe
that there is no future today
for
narrow trade unions
that only focus
on bread and butter issues
instead of taking vigorously
issues of members
that are equally issues
of the broader working class
and the poor as well
In the past ten years
informed by this strategy
we have sought
to position organised workers
as the leading detachment
of the working class
- in a position
that it will not just lead itself
but lead all sections of the society
On some occasions
we have been successful
sometimes not
Sometimes
there been serious tensions
between COSATU and the ANC led government
but on balance
we believe
that we succeeded
in ensuring that workers
have the voice
and that its message is understood
in every aspect
of transformation
On balance
workers have made
huge gains
although we also
have suffered serious setbacks
But the struggle
is never
going to run like clockwork
In November and December this year
we hope to have
a major conference
to analyse
the first ten years
of South African freedom
from the workers's point of view
Globalisation
has had a huge impact
on our experiences
since 1994
when we won democracy
Under apartheid
the sanctions campaign
meant that our economy
was largely isolated
from the forces
of globalisation building up
in the 1970s and 80s
Then we opened our economy
in record time in the 1990s
just
as we achieved independence
As a result of this situation
we experienced
the shocks associated with globalisation
in a condensed dose
- not a pleasant experience
for tens of thousands of workers
many of whom
saw their jobs
casualised or disappear
their companies close down
outsource or be swallowed up
by foreign multinationals
The opening of the economy
had three main effects
on South African workers
First
thousands lost their jobs
as companies faced
a vast increase incompetition
A few sectors
have managed
to increase exports
but mostly
they are relatively capital intensive
and create few jobs
Yet today
unemployment in South Africa runs at 40%
That is
two out of every five
adults
is looking for work
- and
two of every three workers
under 30 years old
are jobless.
Unfortunately
since 1994
our main export growth
has been in minerals
auto and heavy chemicals
hardly sectors
that can dent
the extraordinarily high levels
of unemployment
left by apartheid
Second
in response to the risks
of world capital flows
in the late 1990s
our government adopted
the conservative fiscal and monetary policy
known as GEAR
Specifically
GEAR was sold to our government
as necessary to create
an environment conducive
to investment
and to avoid
the sort of crisis
that hit Asia and Mexico
in the mid-1990s
COSATU still feels
there were alternatives
GEAR led to real cuts
in the budget
and interest rates
of over 20% in the late 1990s
Not surprisingly
economic growth
stagnated
the public service downsized
and unemployment
soared in this period.
Since 2000
the government
has increased its spending
substantially
and
relaxed monetary policy
to some extent
COSATU does not feel
it has gone far enough
in either direction
but at least it's an improvement.
Finally
the government felt
it had no choice
but to adopt
unpopular policies
including on privatisation
and went against its stated objectives
of deepening participatory
democracy
Do not misunderstand:
South Africa still has
some of the strongest democratic institutions
in the world
But government has been very reluctant
to open debates
on macro- economic policy
since it knows
its own constituencies oppose
its positions.
Comrades and friends,
This is a very short and simplistic overview
of how globalisation
and specifically
the opening of the economy
since 1994
has affected South Africa
If you want more
detail
you can look at our website
The Secretariat Reports
to our Congresses
include a detailed overview
of political
and economic developments.
South Africa's experience
with globalisation is not unique
just rather more intense
This was the finding
of the ILO's
World Social Commission
to which I belonged
together with
the President of the AFL CIO
John Sweeney
That Commission
found that globalisation
has led to
the marginalisation
and
impoverishment of millions
Its results also demonstrate
to the surprise of most people
that globalisation
has been associated
with a slowdown in global growth
in the past
twenty years
Here
it seems appropriate
to speak to the lessons
we have learned
from these hard experiences
Above all
our experience may help us
explore how
the international labour movement
should respond to globalisation
We need to reflect
both
on the root causes
of this type of situation
and on the realities of power
that shape our responses.
Generally
the labour movement internationally
has seen the joblessness and casualisation
arising from globalisation
as a problem of the race to the bottom
That is
increased world trade
makes workers
increasingly
compete with each other
leading to worse security
and lower incomes for all
while only capital gains
No one can doubt
that trade sometimes
brings benefits
- but growing trade
under the control
of the multinational corporations
is much less likely
to benefit workers.
Where we as a labour movement
have been less strong
however
has been to analyze
what leads to this undercutting
Generally
we have effectively given
two reasons
First
we have focused on countries
where the State
does not protect workers' rights
or worse
itself oppresses
and
attacks unions
The solution then is obvious
- to get the State to live up to
its obligations to protect workers.
Second
we have noted
that national governments
have lost considerable power
as a result of globalisation
They simply cannot control
multinational firms
the way they can discipline
domestic companies
Moreover
multilateral organisations
like the WTO
World Bank
and the IMF
can wield considerable power over small
poor developing states
This analysis leads
to two main solutions
On the one hand,
it leads
to the emphasis
on linking trade
to core labour standards
At least if workers
can organise themselves
they are less likely
to end up
competing on pay
and conditions
On the other hand
it supports a focus
on cross-border unity
to negotiate
with the multinationals directly
Together
workers in the North and South
can unite and exercise
their power against their bosses
Obviously
these are important elements
in any effort
to make the international economy
serve workers and the poor
But our experience in South Africa
suggests
that they are simply not
enough
For one thing
much of our production
is not controlled by
multinationals
The main sectors
where engagement
with multinational companies
makes sense for us
are in auto pharmaceuticals
and to a limited extent
in clothing and appliances production
The vast majority
of our members work
in South African owned companies
and in the state sector
In addition
there may be
a fine line
between solidarity and dependence
South African unions
cannot afford
to tell their members
just depend on solidarity
from workers and consumers
in the North
We need to find ways
to control our own destiny
as part
of the international labor movement.
For this reason
the international labor movement
needs to do more
to focus on
support for national development strategies
That in turn means
unions in the South
must engage
with the state
rather than just capital
It also means
that the international labor movement
must increase pressure
on the states of the North
to stop sabotaging
development efforts
in the South
whether directly
or
through the WTO and IMF
Again
our own experience underscores
the need
for this kind of shift in direction
In South Africa
the state has provided
strong legal protection for workers
It has reversed
the oppression of unions
found under apartheid
with protection
for workers' organization
the right to negotiate
and strike
and strong measures
to end child labor
and
discrimination in the workplace
It sets minimum pay
for domestic, farm and other vulnerable workers
as well as
regulating working time
dismissals
and health and safety
for
all employees.
The fact is
however
that with soaring unemployment
it is increasingly hard
to enforce these laws
Our people are
simply too desperate for work
Moreover
we have seen
a flight
of some companies
to neighboring countries
which are
even more impoverished.
Overall
the job losses
in manufacturing
and mining
since the mid-1990s
mean that COSATU
has not grown at all
in the past three years
after a decade
in which it more than doubled in size.
In short,
unless we can overcome
the unemployment crisis,
we
cannot ensure sustainable improvement
in workers' conditions.
Simply having decent labour laws
and a sympathetic state
isn't enough.
COSATU's Eighth Congress
last year
recognised this
in its resolution
on a medium-term strategy
which we call
"Consolidating working-class power,
for quality jobs Toward 2015."
A core commitment
is to pressure
business
and
government
to work with us
to develop sector strategies
to create sustainable employment
We don't have time here
to go in depth
into our proposals
for a development strategy
for South Africa
. Our core demand
is that government
and business
do more
to restructure
the formal sector
toward job- creating growth.
That means, above all,
supporting expansion
in light industry and services,
which were both hard hit
by the opening of the economy
in the early 1990s.
To achieve this aim,
South Africa
must back off from
the current trade strategy,
which seeks to lower barriers
to trade at all costs.
We need a more differentiated approach
that will let us
build up new capacity
and kinds of production over time.
Moreover, we need a more careful
approach
to shape access
to world markets
so that it will
create jobs on balance,
and not destroy them.
But we also need to focus more
on industries that produce
for
the local and regional market.
To take an example,
only 20%
of our clothing production
goes for exports.
Of that, around
a third goes to
the rest of Africa.
We need to develop
a strategy
that relies
not just on engaging
the multinationals
and brand names from the North,
but on meeting
the needs of our people
in South Africa
and in neighbouring countries.
A stronger focus
on meeting local needs
will insulate us
to a limited extent
from the negative effects
of globalisation.
This type of approach,
which engages
both employers and the state
reflects the long-term experience
of the labour movement worldwide.
Unions have always
had the greatest successes
where they have gotten
the state to establish
an enabling environment.
In the modern world,
the state plays a critical role
in shaping the circumstances
in which we work.
We cannot simply ignore it.
At the same time,
we in the labour movement
have a critical role to play
in disciplining business,
both at home and abroad,
so that it cannot simply
exploit our people.
======================================
end of part one
===========================================
Posted by herb jr. jr. at October 26, 2004 10:49 AM
Comments
Post a comment
|