April 20, 2006

say ....whaaaaaaaat


"Between the 1960s and 1990s
 the percentage of Americans 
who felt:

 "the government is run
 by a few big special interests 
looking out only for themselves" 

doubled to 75 percent

 yup 

3/4 of  old hickory's 
              liberty  nation 
                knows its near  powerless 

  and  so it does. what ????

      .......NOTHIN  
accordin to this pundi-tatter 


3/4 s of us all
  take it 
and act like we  likes it
just 
like the shrimp
 takes his daily ram 
             on cell block six 

well i say 
                      ...whaaaaaaaaat !!!!!!!!!



==================================



here's
   ALL FUSS AND FRAGGLED
    Bradford Plumer  assistant web editor 
                         of Mother Jones:

" Does economic inequality matter
 all that much? 
Some economists would say no 
 As Anne Krueger 
of the International Monetary Fund 
said in 2002,
 "It seems far better
 to focus on impoverishment 
than on inequality." 


"Americans seem to agree 
polls suggest that most people 
in the United States aren't bothered
 by inequality per se
 so long as everyone
 has a reasonable chance
 to move up the income ladder 
through hard work
 and a bit of ingenuity"

------- mobility opportunity 
   and big pay offs ----------


" the only kind of inequality 
that really bothers Americans 
is political inequality"

------- and yet ...---------

" the public has increasingly 
felt that to be the case "

-------- really 
 great
the mass of the little  people 
  feel they're 
losing power .....

shit 
thats been  felt on and off
   around  here
          since shay's rebellion

the question is 

     they   think they're losing it 

alright then to who ???
maybe its not  the rich per se 
maybe the hoi say
the rich there always with us
its the ...--------
 
------- but first lets plod along 

with our host here ...---------
 
"Between the 1960s and 1990s 
the percentage of Americans 
who felt :
 'the government is run
 by a few big special interests
 looking out only for themselves' 
doubled to reach 76 percent "



------ okay 
but resolve the conflict
created by your own  phrases here 


 if 3/4 s  know the political deal
 is  getting more ' unequal' 
what actions prove 
it "really bothers" em ??? 

or do they figure 
these "big  special interest"
 have enough interests in common 
with the little people's interests
to rep em 
say in  beating back
' cretain other special interests ' 
unequally  gaining influence 
 or at least beating em back 
enough of the time 

to let these bottom line  oligarchs 
continue their top  ride 
at least 
till further  ballot box notice  
but to continue .....-----------------




" Why is the government being run 
by a 'few big special interests'?  
increasingly
 a tiny portion of the population 
has an inordinate amount of wealth"


--------thats the view  of the 3/4 s
             its  a growing rule of the rich ????
that and that alone ?????
all we gotta fear is 
the growing wealth share  bulge
 at the top of the social   pole ???? 
  well according to our man that's what ...------

" Political scientists are converging around "

------ the supporting evidence ???-------




 "  over  the 25 years
Between 1979 and 2003,
 the income of the richest 1 percent
 of Americans more than doubled,
 the income of the middle 15 percent 
grew by only 15 percent, 
and the income of the poorest 20 percent 
barely budged "

" By the late 1990s
 the richest one percent of Americans households
 had a third of all wealth in the economy
 and took in 60 percent of the country's income
a greater share than at any point 
since the Great Depression"

--------okay we'll stipulate that part
wealth  got more  unequal after the vietnam war 
as it did after the civil war
  as it did after 
the first world war ------------

---
but hey
a princeton prof claims 
he finds evidence ...-----

" even when Democrats controlled Congress.
  Senators were very responsive 
to the preferences of the upper third 
of the income spectrum
  and completely ignored the policy preferences 
of the poorest third of Americans"


------  as an example
this guy
( Bartels) 
claims to have ..-------


" discovered that senators 
were only likely to vote 
for a minimum wage increase 
if and when their wealthier constituents
 favored it
the views of those directly affected
 by the hike had "no discernible impact"


------- is it as clear as the link
 between smoking and lung cancer ???? 
if so you got a 30 year fight left ahead of u -------------


-------- but forget domestic policy
how about the great game ....-------

" Lawrence Jacobs of the University of Minnesota 
and Benjamin Page of Northwestern 
found that that the foreign policy views 
of the executive and legislative branches 
are primarily influenced by business leaders
 policy experts
whose think tanks 
are often funded by businesses.....
.... the views of the broader public 
have essentially zero impact on the government 
when it comes to tariffs, treaties, 
diplomacy or military action"

---- again  
u think facts matter
giving off
 with the evidence shit
bet you
the corporate science crowd 
has  a study
that shows no relationship here at all 
what say u ??? 
besides the perception of powerless 
already exists whats your point
to prove who  benefits from gub action
we all know its corporations 
the question is 
why the hoi even knowing
 they're powerless  don't fuckin do somethin about it 
                 as in
 this is not....
                 my beautiful democracy ----------


" The political theorist Walter Russell Mead
 famously argued that "Jacksonian" nationalism 
in the heartland drove American foreign policy 
   the data doesn't back him up
 Business still runs the world "

---- 'still' thats an odd addition
to your prsentation 
    one has to guess u mean 
the biz runnership of the state pre dates 
the last 25 years 
then  
all this added 
               wealth unequalizing
 was lilly guilding...
                 state power wise 
so   why the fan fare ?????  -------

 ----------- now with the  donorocracy  bit --------

"the average Senate campaign in 2006 
will cost about $10 million, minimum,
  in the 2000 election,
 95 percent of all campaign contributions 
came from households making over $100,000"

 
 -----  but here's where the real smelly camels nose
finaly sticks itself  under the tent side
theres big interests congealing 
below the biz klass....------------

"there are more well-educated Americans 
in rapidly-growing professional societies 
than there are lesser-educated workers
 in trade unions"

 
-------hey why don't the light dawn here...

 maybe these  are the target fucks
the professional  klass 
the new morality reformers 
and nose holders  
the i love a cannibal
but i think u stink crowd 

 maybe they are the power grabbing bothersome bunch
   over at  
 white hoi majority house 
 maybe these self important prickles
 even more then dilberts boss 
are the ones  the little guy hates
the one's they fugure
  is forcing  uncle
to give these bad rub downs
maybe its  the party of  
   eat your spinach 
that is the greater evil

maybe defeating 
or at least rolling back
these  secret  martian's designs 
is the best the people 
                  can get 

fuck at least 
the biz bombers 
wack the fuckin 
 nanny dearest  fuckers 

maybe 
defeating  
that supercilious cunt brigade 
with the  mortor boards on their   heads
and the gleaming  coat hangers
 in their   hands

maybe clobbering them
    makes a  corporate lobby  congress  
bareable 
at least they'll blow  that fuckin 
 poised  hanger gang  out of the water  --------



  ------maybe 
 dealing with  todays 
 variety of male and female peckerwoods
 its no longer necessary
the biz  elites bow  
be4 
any
  ass kickin 
jacksonian democracy 

maybe today that
 would be excessively 
indulgent 
and completely 
               wasteful  

maybe all
 the board room  big shots need
is to sponsor 
a few 
jacksonian  class and race circuses 

  a twin bill

first show 

knock a few high horse 
     fems and fruit pickers 
off their  mighty pink ponys .. ..

 guys like 
ole  glass lantern 
                  john  kerry 

or that pop eyed big faced 
    judgemental  lass
   high C   hillary    
 
 and as the main feature 

 give the pale knuckle draggers 
a  new  uncle  sam
   screamin eagle  production
 
 blazin action 

sun drenched locales 
  
lots and lots  a hoverin  copters
roaring and  blowin  sand 
and  
  at the climax
   a  cast of thousands 
  no tens of thousands
   of fuckin 
    rag clad 
    bomb blast  fleeing  duskey limbos  " 

hey it works ...

sure it gets old 
 
sure the donk spawl   
comes in handy
when rest is called for 


now and again 
giving the lesser head 
a shot 
only works
to hold the fort all the better 

yup 
its poetry in motion

 we crap out
  and
  then we force 
   them  bent over donkey  phd's 
              pick up our shit piles 


and they can go on pickin it up 
till   damn it 
     we're ready once again
                    to roll for  glory 
 
 

with frustration
sometimes all you need
is a nice distraction


give most  dinks  enough side show 

and the pot in their head
                   won't boil over 

fortunately thats only true

most of the time 

 there are those jubilee  moments 

and folks i feel one a coming  

Posted by pinky at April 20, 2006 07:15 AM