House of Paine

some cutz and slashes

here's a guy that reads iron mike's blog

 who
has A BLOG  of his own 

i visited  it recently ...

all very black and bleaky 

 he seems to  get his-self
all twisted  up
  and over and over again


    it looks
    to be the result  of 
      the action / inter action / re action
            of
        the same   few  
            psycho-tropic forces  
                       that  tie 
                 a lot of other youthful
                  lefticularly  lobed 
                    bloggery ites                   
                              all up in   knots too
               

==========================


 
heres an instance

himself has just  read
an  nyt account
       of young paris in the streets 

and so  himself quite spontaneously
alone there in his electoric garret 
goes for his  fake- ault 

dips in paddles thru a few dozen pages 
and comes back with this 

"In 'Useless to Revolt? '
                   he  (  the great fake ault)
 posits
  revolutionary forces 
in relation to politics...."

 ----' posits ' mind you 
not   'places' 
in relation to ......'politics '

not  the existing political institutions 
             nothing that concrete   -----------------

" Revolution represents 
the limit that defines government ...."

------  okay.... a restatement
                 fair enough 
surely a revolution might await all states
                              down the road  ----


" and normal politics "

   ---yes  indeed a rev is not  "normal poiltics "--------------

---   but is it true
       the rev is ---


" ... the point at which 
no demand or threat of sovereignty       
       can overcome a political demand for change"

--------------- notice  a story about street action
has reified into
  a dialogue between reb and state  
   an exchange of   demands and threats ------------------

---------- and  now watch...---------


" When someone steps in front 
of a tank or a battalion of police officers"

-------an act indeed a  solitary inert  act it seems 
worthy of a jim crow lunch counter -----------

".... they demonstrate the basic limits 
of a government founded 
on the protection and regulation of life"

---------- not sure i get the meaning here
  but if i do
  to me
   this is an  not a revolutionary act
but an act  of  defiance
         at best
 a token  a symbolic resistence
   not  even a rebellion 
let alone revolution -------------

" The response to this
 by the politics of sovereignty 
is to define the specifics of revolution
 in an attempt to include it in its power"


--------- hows that for 
spilling the conflicted prose garble ...

  the  results
of an agonized 
 notion leaping
  speculative  parlor kat 

what junkets the mind may make eh???  ------------

" Essentially, to make revolution 
or radical protest intelligible to sovereignty"


--------- now this
        radical   citizen  vs  state dialogue
                    has a  mind
                            at each end
                                     of itself 
on one end
  the  would be rev reb  rad and  on the  other 
                   sovereignty  itself
          .... errr and the  state  is trying
to understand  the rad  shouting at it  ------------ 

" That’s why Mao instituted
      state run revolution:


------------ i guess this includes 
the bit 40 years ago too 
       the gpcr phase one and two --------

"... to define revolutionary actions
 as strengthening the state
 and so usurp their force as a limit"

--------------------- marvelous 

'usurp their force as a limit  '

  
              all is but broadcasted  
                    word play 
                     states role :
                  mass mind fucking 
                      stink think thunkery 
orwellian total states 
                   at play  ---------------
--------------that over arching construct now in place ...----------

". Another strategy ..."

---- a lesser one -----------


"...is to diminish the limit function
. To demonstrate the action 
as less than revolutionary "


------------  ie mind fuck em 

by saying their dicks too small 

make em feel 
 after all they're so silly and feeble
  they remain haplessly 
"  inside the box " --------------

------------- but damned if next 
don't  comes this ...----------

"– to relate the demands
 that require death 
to a specific state action
 and so usurp their power"


------------   acolyte 
of the great
 fake -ault attacks


'that require death' ??? 

is this fraud meme oif the state
something like

"only the all powerful  vanguard party
can kill with rightteousness " ------------



" This then, 
is the function of the  nyt article: 
to regulate the limit-function ‘revolution’
 has to state power"


----------- again marvelous 
i have no idea how muxch bigger a notion
  then the bit thats commonplace here
 this chap intends to message me with 

the obvious part 
i "get"
acting as unofficial 
voice of state 

 nyt broadcasts:

  " pay no attention to those froggy kids 
                                   over there in the streets....
                 they're just acting out
                    its  an impossible lark ...
                                   celebrating
                            the absurdity  of a  pipe dream  "--------------------

to sum up

ain't this  fierce little thinkin guy 
       rendering himself " mighty harmless "


" ha haaaaaaaaa

my mind has usurped the usurper "

but so what the state still stands
armed and ready
        on every street corner 


the idea of the rev still reigns 
up there 
    in that blog of his own

but he needs to get out some 

hey 
i'm old 
branding  practical experiences
   be-stripe me 
i'm 
           haunted
                at every turn by the spectre
                   of
               former real consequences 

but this raw sort

 he needs
   to  take the digital  hair shirt off
  and plunge 
     out his luneete window 
              into a   deep blue  water struggle