prc policy leap???
at the econ con
comment panels again
subject
can the han types slow fast enough
their export growth
to stay a safe
6 quarters behind
the forward drifting
north club
protectionist ice burg
=====================
its really not that complex on the outside
raise domestic demand reduce export demand
but can the system handle the switch fast enough
without causing an internal job growth drop
critical path
how wide and doable
well i pretend to know more detail then i tell
" brad :
been back there again
three times in 4 months
now at last they've had enough of me
when i read this post i thought you were going to lower the boom
but by the end it was drifting slowly back to same old same old
one problem with the daily blog system
the real pace of development
shows
broadcasters used to call it
god aweful vamping
but taking stock
here
let me say
the gear shift over there
is already well under way
and
take my word for it
most middle level guys agree with you
its prolly too late
the great han
north country export wall approaches
too fast to avoid a serious impact
why?
cutting ex growth now
at full clip
to a sustainable rate
prolly takes 10 quarters
the consensus median availible
6 quaters maybe less
so now its not whether but how bad
both in norte america and euro europe
there will be a re action
so its now damage control
and ready the repair methods
put it another way
unless the north club
has a major expansion rate slow down
that can slow the import growth rate
which of course causes macro problems
for the hans itself since they can't land this crate
any faster without a job lack
idl;e toilers pile up
blah blah
as feed backs and flow forwards
loop into more nastiness...
oh u get the gist ...
but i doubt
a serious north country
recession
can squeeze itself
in between now and then
to shorten
the present longer but not long enough road
to point rubber bounce
what am i saying
it will be hgalf assed
and with proper diplomacy
on both the han
and trans nat sides
manageable
----------------------------------
but change in the
slow down direction is coming
but
that ain't sayin much
since
as you point out
25% per annum ex growth
with a base already so big
looks godzilla like
even from wall street
Written by Gcs
that said
later
i splash in further
here goes...
--------------------------------
side bar
we pick it up
where i clout
this fish head stephen roach
like
some other corporate biz press pundits
roach
loves to waggle his nickel platted ass
over this big economies in collision shit
in this instance
meet and sup
with the han macro-cheeses
swallow their chin chin blarney
and leave thinkin
he sees right thru em ....
as in
" brad:
i read roach
hard on me
because he's to my mind
a mediocre gas bag
MY TAKE HE SEZ NOTHING HERE
FREED UP CREDIT MARKETS SEEKING THE INVISIBLE HAND
.....SNARK ATTACK ....
WARMED OVER IDIOTS
DOGMA IN A DISH
BANKERS SPECIAL
btw
he no more knows the inner mind of "Chairman Ma "
then i know the inner mind of doctor phil
this highest level chit chat shit
under the flood lites
really isn't very revealing
its further down the policy pole
say at the gut level
where the 'umble
poli wogs toil
that l the tale gets told
in better detail warts and bruises showing
these han party econcon staffers
and such
the ones actually toiling away
in the various old school
word and number mills
are sweating bullets
right now
its like watching
engineers in a launch pad control room
on a tv monitor
during the moments before lift off
only with the video tape running
at one /1000 th normal speed
this is a key stage
a policy cataract
but its proceeding at an agonizing pace
now imagine some imp running
at regular speed dashing around
tempted to f.. with the controls
thats how these guys feel
when they think of the high mucks up on the bridge
the guys like Ma
who could cave to sudden pressures
and set in motion a sequence of palliative
bad moves
that wrecks
the long run of everything
Written by Gcs
after a pause i add ....
"brad writes
"China's unwillingness to change the market signals "
but brad its not about signals
or at least the signals hardly tell much about credit flows
" a cheap currency and low interest rates "
the inside system uses different avenues
"that have encouraged export and investment led growth"
no they only facilitate a plan decision
" may make it hard to smoothly transition
to another basis for growth"
no such alibi in reality
the market no more dictates most
of what "new" that gets built
then in the us war machine building economy of 1940-45
in fact despite his windy delf inflation
this one point roach makes
in his own back assward way:
system to system translationrequires noting the differences in mechanics
the prc's investment credit system
is not in any way rate driven
either as to type
location or volumne
the micro allocations are in fact
pure plan/admin "yesing and noing "
hence the full feathered head-dress
of big C plannner Ma
not figurehead but razor sharp
talking
icon of the real system
those too often
irrascible central banker guys
you've quoted
here on occasion are but ..moneychangers
think of it metaphorically
a contest
of peking planners vs shanghai bankers
and the boys from peking
are party favored and in any re deal
end up with most of the aces
we come from
two still very very different systems
the up side
i think
their system....
could ...could pull off this massive re direction
will it ?
my odds 2 to 1
internally its like 50/50
but then there's the outside worlds re action
and thats 100% on the no go side
Written by Gcs "
Posted by pinky at March 28, 2006 02:16 AM