socialist countryside ????
in today's NYT
the current
burgerized tale
out of
china deepens measurably
======================================
"My impression is that allowing
an expanded role for the market
in education and health care
is off the table," said Mr. Mao
"Rural land ownership is also
too sensitive to consider now"
"Mr. Liu said,
"If you establish a market economy
in a place like China,
where the rule of law is imperfect,
if you do not emphasize
the socialist spirit of fairness
and social responsibility,
then the market economy you establish
is going to be an elitist market economy."
Mr. Zhou attracted foreign investment
to the financial sector,
partly delinked China's currency
from the United States dollar
and steered the three biggest
state-owned banks toward
stock market listings overseas "
the klass struggle continues
and
even as the wrong road party rots away
Great names reappear
if in other
and often lesser roles ...
nyt oddly dead on
sum up quote :
"A widening gap between rich and poor
is not the fault of market reforms
It's the natural result of them,
which is neither good nor bad,
but quite predictable."
===================================
Posted by pinky at March 13, 2006 07:40 AM