its really wage targeting
but that remains unspoken
because wages may need a crank
even when the rate of inflation
exceeds the rate og wage gains
as it has this past year .....
=======================================
counterpunch:
"Employers' wage costs grew 2.3%
over the past year
Factoring in
the recent energy-driven
increase in inflation
the real wage is down 2.3%"
"certainly not the path we would expect
in an economy posting strong productivity gains"
around this same rate has
prevailed for the last four quarters
Compensation-wages plus benefits-
also grew slowly in the third quarter
of this year
up 3.1% over the same quarter last year
the slowest yearly growth in six years"
For the first time in this employers' costs report, the Bureau of Labor Statistics presented these values adjusted for inflation.
"Both wages and compensation
are losing ground
in real terms
down 2.3% and 1.5%, respectively"
--------------------------------------------------
there is an ongoing
freakish imbalance
in the present expansion
as productivity
per hour rises rapidly
profits billow
but job comp limps
even faulters
lagging wage and compensation
demonstrates
increasing unit labor costs
are not pushing up prices
the labor market
is far from overheating that needs to be cooled
by Federal Reserve rate hikes"
and yet we've had these hikes any way
if its not to curb wages and commodity prices
what is it for ????
Posted by lady eve at October 29, 2005 09:14 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)