jesus
can we stop talking about gubmint fiscal deficits
as
" dis -saving "
households save
gubmints don't
gubmints may tax draft
charge borrow jail
grant confiscate
etc etc etc
but they don't
save
so they can't ....dis save
===========================================
--------------------------------------
then how come the goo goo word useage ????
cause what is called saving
is cutting some poor oafs life line
my test
would the oaf call it saving
or involuntary imposed
no choice involved sacrifice
thats a bloody cut
a slash not in fact
a national saving
a slash
imposed like a jail sentence or a fine
a saving jesus saved us by sacrficing himself
he didn't save himself though did he
but were we saving or just saved
------------------------------
and whats further more
saving since
saving
is
by definition
a voluntary act
forced saving
is a hideous oxymoron
used to " calvin coat"
a national
bon fire to warm
the hands of the fortunate
fueled by
the scarfices
of
the lumpin helots
----------------------------------------------
a case to the point
this is the daily wash post
on uncle ben bernanke :
"Bernanke advocates
reducing the federal budget deficit
as a way to increase
national saving
and help shrink
the nation's record trade deficit"
increase national savings .....
translation:
cut gub expenditures
and there by reduce
our national borrowing
from over seas
now
to u're mind
is the phrase
'increase national savings'
a fair compression of that ???
or just
a loud misdirecting analogy
to pop telling
his tikes
he's cutting their allowences
cause
'we're reaching our family debt limit '
why not more ???
cause uncle sam
is issuing the debt
in dollars
by authentic analogy
pop should be able
to pay back his debt
in 'house script '
a scrript who's market value
will
be determined
by pop
at a later date
------------------------------------------
bernanke's exact words :
"The United States should work
to increase its national saving rate
over time,
by encouraging private saving..."
okay so far
"... and by controlling
federal spending
to reduce the budget deficit"
voila
the obscene conflation
------------------------------------------------
now we're on big bens tail:
"Bernanke argues
that the budget deficit be shrunk
by first reducing spending
"as much as possible . . . "
why ???
because raising taxes
"would have
negative impacts on the economy."
here we are a go going
again
more tax free profit zoning
cause of the trickle down
gyser up effect
-------------------------------------------
will he gabble in public
about such non monetary shit ?????
yup
but only when
" deficits and debt
are threatening macroeconomic
and financial stability"
read
" i'll intervene at will "
Posted by lady eve at October 29, 2005 07:23 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)