how boston doth whither away the new york mother ship has krugman our globe..... chuck stein ================================ Wise hunches and a bit of luck shined on Greenspan's reign By Charles Stein | October 23, 2005 " 'Give me lucky generals' Napoleon once said. The French emperor had that one right. It helps to be smart, but it never hurts to be lucky. Which brings me to the subject of today's column: the legacy of Alan Greenspan. By January, President Bush will have to name a replacement for the man who has managed monetary policy since 1987 The Greenspan era was an impressive one Over the course of 18 years the economy grew steadily interrupted only by two short recessions while inflation moved progressively lower So here's the question: Was Greenspan successful because he was skillful or because he was lucky? My answer: Both. Greenspan came to the Fed job with a lot going for him: He was smart he had a storehouse of knowledge about the American economy and he had a long list of contacts in business and politics who supplied him with information But Greenspan's greatest strength turned out to be something different ''He is an agnostic," said Allen Sinai chief economist at Decision Economics in New York. Sinai is referring to Greenspan's practice of monetary policy not religion. Greenspan was willing to disregard Federal Reserve orthodoxy when the evidence and his instincts told him that it made sense to strike out in a new direction ''He let events shape his views rather than let doctrinaire views shape policy " said Sinai. The best example of that was Greenspan's willingness to keep interest rates low in the mid- to late-1990s The economy was growing robustly and by 1997 the jobless rate was below 5 percent The expected Fed response was clear: Interest rates needed to move higher to head off a possible outbreak of inflation Greenspan disagreed He sensed that American companies were boosting their productivity -- their output per worker -- which meant the economy could grow faster than usual without putting pressure on prices Greenspan was right about productivity By holding off on rate increases he allowed the nation to enjoy a brief golden period ''His willingness to change is important in a world that changes rapidly," said Nariman Behravesh chief economist at Global Insight in Waltham As a central banker Greenspan's chief task was to keep inflation in check On that score he had the good fortune to be in the right place at the right time A series of forces -- all outside the control of the government -- have conspired to hold down prices over the past two decades Within the United States deregulation of airlines telecommunications and energy brought competition and price-cutting to new industries Globally the rise of China and India and their integration into the world economy dramatically expanded the pool of low-cost labor available to American companies When it filed for bankruptcy protection recently Delphi Corp. let its American employees know that the company's Chinese workers earn $3 an hour a figure that includes health and pension benefits Better computers and the Internet have made American businesses more productive and empowered shoppers to search for bargains in places far from home If that were not enough from 1987 to 2000 energy prices were consistently low Greenspan was no more responsible for cheap gasoline than Bush is responsible for today's high prices at the pump he hardly ever had to be the bad guy Neither did his counterparts around the globe The truth is inflation rates began coming down around the world about 15 years ago In Mexico the inflation rate fell from 26 percent in 1990 to less than 5 percent in 2004 Over that same time the worldwide inflation rate as calculated by the International Monetary Fund fell from 25 percent to 3 percent The world's central bankers may have been good sailors but it is clear they had a powerful wind at their backs. So here is my advice to President Bush: Find yourself a lucky Federal Reserve chairman It will make life easier for everyone.Posted by lady eve at October 24, 2005 02:03 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)