what is it with me these days properly chided by grack and still at it ============================ if the doom tollers can johnny one ring their bells so can I ... and here's a fucking cascade of same note bells from herr greider the man's like one of those old fifties fullbacks he plows into the line for "3 yards and a cloud of dust" he hasn't the swiftness of foot for an end run turn the corner?? hell he can't even get out there but he'll make a ton of carries inside problem: on both of the E and E meters he's hopelessly feeble neither very enlightening nor very entertaining ... at least intentionally so lets look for some sub text on this rainy mellow morn greider on.... household savings : "In July families spent at an annual rate $101 billion more than their disposable income " ----- given the nature of these things i bet there was one" shopping day" that month if annualized ... my point annualizations like most point extrapolations are silly booo !!!! or rah rah !!!! moves one months rate does not a season make why not say at an unsustainable rate that is if you mean or dare to say something that simple but more basic why not throw in : today three years into "recovery " globe's trans-nat corporations are still hording at such a gigantic rate the twin deficit terrors : 1) large scale gubmint and household borrowing and 2)the equally huge international payments deficit are easily accomadated without a interest rate spike moral: at least get the real balance sheet sketched out before dumping in the bromides -------- -----------klass may leave here------------ ---------------------------------------- segment two ------ try on this halloween mask ---- " (the current level of household dis-savings is ) certainly the worst since .......... the banking crisis of 1933" ------ the banking crisis of '33 eh ?? okay okay so thats some pretty fine unintended entertainment a clown's florish silly solemn lovely hyperbole to which i can only add and too think this time it ain't even inducive by "fear it self" not at all in fact quite the contrary --------- ------------------------------------ more bumps waiting for us in the night greider on possible "convergences of bad things " one " consumers ( may)now pull back from spending to rebuild savings ( and many will have no choice)... " ------ "rebuild savings" dear prudence what a euphemism and about whom ????? and whats with the Dondi esque bathos of "many will have no choice " how about: way too many fucking hapless fools are fast reaching the tapped out point... 'credit wise' speaking of course so consequently when they give out whats to sustain effective demand ???------ --- but here it really comes now ....--------- "this retrenchment may converge " ---- yes yes double trouble that would generally spell bigger trouble but errrr converge with what ???--- "with other negative forces" -------- ya ya shoot me the word here greidy nope what ho seems they are to be named at a later date but not their combinatory effect ... -------- " this conjunction could easily develop into a downward cycle leading to..." ( CUE ECHO CHAMBER ) " RECESSION recession recession ...... " "Given these fragile circumstances" ------- NOTICE HIS CASE IS JUDGED TO BE PROVED HERE READ THIS AS : ' GRANT ME THE FOLLOWING FOR THE SAKE OF MY STORY: TODAY'S WHOLE FUCKING ECONOMY IS TEETERING LIKE A GIANT TURKEY ON THE TIPS OF A LONG FRAIL BAMBOO FORK THANX TO TOO MUCH BORROWED SPENDING AND ...OTHER GHASTLY TERPITUDINOUS NEGATIVES ------------ -------------------------------- A JUMP ...ONE OF MANY " the prevailing currents of official thinking are all pushing the economy in the wrong direction " ------ note well lads : " official thinking" here is "pushing the economy ..." MIND OVER PROSPERITY --------- ------ and more jumps whats with the jumps any way ??? is he trying to avoid getting plugged by a digital sniper ???? this jump is more exciting though its a sudden drastic leap to great heights from whence to get a proper op ed pocket Odin overview ------- " Economic policy is often decided as an unpleasant choice among various bad outcomes " --- no comment.. the few of you still reading on feel free to savor ----- --- today i remind u is one of those dismal choice days proof you're here ----- ------ so he some dismal posing does ----------- "which consequence would be the worst for the country right now ? " -------on the one hand keep at the borrowing and ...----------- " Swelling federal deficits will have deleterious effects on the future " ----- that appears to be short hand for something intricate and highly detailed he's forced (by space pressure) to cram into that tiny phrase like you'd cram a model three master in a beer bottle but this beer bottle is of such murky glass only the vaguest of outline and mass can be seen ... if u could bash the bottle mac and see whats in there my guess u'd find nothin ok maybe a twisted piece of the sundays funny pages -------------- back to greid and on to the other hand " but right now America actually needs larger federal deficits to get through this storm " ----- sly boots here has kicked our impending crisis up a notch we're headed into a " storm " perfect or otherwise bad news fer sure fer sure ... ----- ------- greid makes his choice ---------- " a government-injected economic stimulus that will quickly generate higher incomes and more jobs " --------- and here's its dismal science dark side ... --------- " A bout of price inflation that will disrupt planning and profits for business and finance " ----- amazing the boob thinks larger deficits create " price inflation" "price" inflation .. thats as against say "balloon or tire or breast " inflation ------- ----- first eve intervention: credit policy at least as it seems to this particular side walk super can play a crucial role here one way or the other in what effects an increased fed deficit produce the fedskins in the face of galloping fed gaps could thighten credit and maybe volker spike the short rates non accomadate "okay dinks how u like that ????" or they could play nice and loosen but whatever is it lock step time do we get the bogey man " price inflation ? ?????" nope not as i mentioned earlier with the global corporate hording rates ??? in fact he's got to know that so i ask ya are ya dickin me here or what greid ??? if not how silly a bean you are how haplessly 70's ------- ---- sparing us more bell bottome mind dribble he's about to jump ahead but before we move on pause to notice again....------- " A bout of price inflation that will disrupt planning and profits for business and finance " -------- "disrupt planning and profits"???? who's planning should this read merely "disrupt profit plans "???--------------- " but that---like all else here ---- is a small matter...." ---he means the bug a boo of inflation so the choice really isn't even dismal whats dismal is the bush mill choice that will be made which surely won't be greid's open uncle's wallet choice ----------- " not compared with the devastation a recession would impose on wage earners and debt-soaked families in the bottom half of the economy " ----- okay so you got a heart but "debt soaked" hmmmmmn very boozlee splash houndish like word choice i smell censorious back story here but forget that why are u so easily falling back into your bell bottom mind set with this pre laffer disco downside inflation /employment trade off phillips curve shit greid honey philips even dynamized phillips has been on the scrap pile for going on 20 years now your proposed " vigorous spending plan" would in fact only help relieve zast global deflationary pressures under present circs i'd vote for this as a win win even if i lived in bongo congo any added uncle spending helps our blessed whole earth by avoiding the 70's mirror image stagnifying deflation ..---------- ---------------- please stop reading -------------- ------ unless your a greenspitzer ----------- ------ like a fair ground mistro speeding up the merry go round to dangerous velocities just as ridership is beginning to flag badly greid gets his patented anti green spam er hoolah going ----- "greenspan's Fed has a single-minded obsession with inflation " ----- true but why ??? say why not what its the why that needs the ceaseless reps here your lack of specifics on motivation as in ... who benefits as in ... why this is rational when coming down from the board rooms of the tall profit towers on the corner of wall and penn --------- ------ no nere's what greid sez its all about its all about a more personal back story ----- " preserve Greenspan's reputation (as inflation fighter number one) as he approaches his retirement " -----what nutty foolery but now he's been mentioned twice let me step across my thread here and give my main dancin man here the rogering he cries for : greenspan has no inner being he can't have a personal motivation at least not while manning the credit ship's bridge greenspuff on the job is the continuation the fucking market ticker by other means a tapewormy cypher sometimes released to run around outside wsure he's allowed out to play now and then allowed to act like he's a plate full of bizwiz fortune cookies but back in harness ... he's only a gear in zee profit giants' tauffle werks maybe a key and final gear but only a gear and as to his fortune cookie messages decrypted all that lizzardized slick four eyed jew boy gibberish amounts to nothin in the oven zero plus zero equals zero a raddle not a riddle no his patter is not so much that of a latter day Sumerian hocus pocus as it is a excessively unctuous jeeves holding off the lynch mod and damned if some how by dumb hook or by pure take with this gooble dee goooker ends up spell binding both press and congress despite time after time a face plain fact trail proving once more 'after the lovin' this meat heads double talk cypher has turned out to be 99% hair oil to 1 % mis-applied science yes when you smoke him down to roach clip time he's got only one message " i suck and swallow " "i suck and swallow " as in the wally big boys' gizzz ------- --------------------------------------- ------ back to inflation fighting -------- ------- say green or his successor decide to end it all by spiking fed rates well greid sez that's ... .------- "... the most wrongheaded and potentially most harmful policy" ------- he's right but his why is... well ... like al falfa's singing cute but way off key ---------- "In the annals of US monetary policy a reliable sign of recession ahead is the central bank's raising interest rates on short-term borrowing higher than the rates on longer-term credit" " The Fed is perilously close to creating that unnatural condition known as .." -----( cue echo again)-------- " THE INVERTED YIELD CURVE CURVE CURVE CURVE " "If Greenspan persists with two or three more rate increases the yellow warning light will be flashing " ------ so we're ALMOST at a yellow lite almost poised to invert ----------- ------- and fans i be not your dick pullin he or his editor leaves us their right their teeter totterin pauline style ---------- ------- yup by a cross cut to the other sub plot the Dems ------------- "Democrats, meanwhile, are still smitten with the Rubinomics they learned in the Clinton years" ---------the clueless buggars----------- " they yearn to win respectability in financial circles by preaching fiscal rectitude" --------- really ??? this confuses party agitprop with back room door matting what dem pols say in public is to get elected what they promise in private is what gets done thats what the donors pay for ...up front no this tight assed rubin rubin shit is not aimed at wall street nor even main street its aimed at elm st where fred six pack dwells at nite the war on poverty may have been finaly been lost by bill clintox ten years ago but the donkeys are still trying to sell themselves to average jane and middle joey as the un deficit party to avoid the pop tar brush slapped so effectively on em by the re-pubz using the simple formula big donkey spending today means bigger donkey imposed little guy taxes tomorrow it 's effective because it 's true only its bipartisan but thats another post eh ??-------------- " Wrong economics and bad politics too" ------ true enough but who sez dems don't win where it counts with their donors their like old hams so we closed out of town there's always another opening and another show ... that iz if we got backers -------- " Repealing the Bush tax cuts is a noble (though unlikely) goal" ------ so klass war donkey style is futile ??? this is pure poison it isn't about raisin taxes its about lowering em a little workin mans supply side hoodoo voodoo don't ever tell me this punk wants real substantive wage klass progress poor relief maybe but... no fuckin way nothing works better for a demagogue party then calling for a workin' mans tax cut thats as old a truth as american politics has got "damn the rich man and cut my taxes " there are work taxes and there are profit taxes this is what i cut and this is what my opponent cuts blah blah blah --------- -------- more miss priss admonisions ------ " moving toward a balanced budget is harmful" ------------- not as agit prop it ain't shit of course you'll balance it right out of the rich mans wallet ----------- "The Democrats should concentrate instead on how to spend money--lots of it-- in smart, socially useful ways that help struggling wage earners" ---- true but they gotta get control first ass hole check out fdr's first run u gotta lie your way past any angry electorate after u've proved yourself well then ... you get fdr in 36 40 44 but first run out of power run make it pure jabberwocky don't tell em how tell em sorta what but most of all who as in "i'm going to give u master wage slug the brake this time joe u get the spoils "-------- ------ the rest is scraps so leave for better groves -------- ----- as in this choice phrase ------ "a progressive multiplier" ------ nice wonk line can't imagine it on talk radio though -------- " With brave exceptions Democrats .... think like uptight bookkeepers " ----- no they only play up tight book keepers on television back stage they're as loose as madonna's male back up dancers ---------- "In the basic design of American capitalism recessions always deliver the most pain and severest losses in reverse order--punishing the weak and less affluent first" --------- more boo hoo tuba playing please who'z this wet slop likely to inform let alone motivate ------ " Thorstein Veblen called it "the slaughter of the innocents," "a nasty ritual that sacrifices the lambs for the benefit of the lions" --------- ya ya ya ya ----------- ----- but then this ....--------- " The rest of us may have to pull back a bit but our lives are not greatly disrupted by recession " ------ ponder that and know why merit klass types like don greidez here council inside the system step by suffering step moderation they ain't got their ballz in a vice ------- ----- see here in two hops he sez more then he's willing to act apon ------- hop one " If they were asked many citizens would perhaps choose recession as the least-bad risk" ----- right you are bozo -------- hop two " The economy is not governed with the bottom half in mind" ------ having written that last bit my question why don't he stop writing then no one "that counts" gives two shits and as for the rest of us.... we don't get it done system wise it seems to me he must understand we otta stop singing in the " ever so holy " choir and instead maybe start burning a few barns down around here why try to change a settled self interested set of minds following their own best interests if your a bottom halfer the logic of his argument iz attack em some how get at em don't beg em don't even bargain with em punch em in the bread basket which in todays driving translates into massive wave after wave of nasty job actions repleat with cops and jail time and such as in the civil rights movement with a little storming state houses and surrounding congress thrown in for weekend sport bottom half rise up and start swinging back the boss up a few steps show you're still in the fight one two one two em act like any future klass champ should --------Posted by lady eve at October 19, 2005 02:20 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)