bench mark sweet crude:
"According to
the U.S. Department of Energy
a 50-cent gas tax increase
on top of
the present
three dollar price
could eventually
reduce gasoline consumption
by 10 to 15 percent "
ie 1/6 th increase in price
means between a 1/10 th and a 1/7 th
reduction in quantity
hmmmnn
thinkin of adding more pump side misery ...
=================================================
well the editors of the washpost are ...
"If Mr. Bush really wants
to promote
more careful energy consumption
he ought to tax gasoline "
"Contrary to what you might suppose
there is something to be said
for imposing an energy tax
when prices are already high"
" Precisely because consumers
are already outraged by fuel prices"
------- can't get no madder eh ?
but there's good sound
policy science here too keeeedz ----------------
" a further tax-induced price increase
would force demand down
more sharply
than it would
in normal market circumstances"
--------- the thrust behind this
escapes me some what
i know i thought i was entering
Marshall world
but how a tax of a certain absolute size would
accelerate its adjustment effect
as it got laid on to
higher and higher starting prices
me no see'm ????? -----------------
---- but i'll agree ...-----------
"This would be painful"
----- ' cause ------
" Consumers don't like cutting back"
----------- take this cod oil
for yer own good
speech comin ??
nope
a few fancy foot steps instead ...------------
" the sharp reduction
in demand
would cause the pretax fuel price
to fall sharply too
offsetting the after-tax increase "
----------- DID U GET THRU THAT ???
oh for a black board
take it from the pinker
its pure cross of saint alfred shit
(yes we are indeed in Marshall world
if in a rather odd piebald quad
but soft ...comes more .... -----------
"This is a smart way
to make oil producers
subsidize U.S. taxpayers"
-------- here's where
they must have started
to feel awefully clever ----------
" Because of the energy tax
producers would face lower demand
and lower market prices..."
----------lacuna fill:
assume extreme cases
a)no cut in supply
or
b) no cut in demand
under
regime a)
to sell it all
the oilers would
need to swallow
the full weight of the tax
under regime b)
users can't part with a drop
and therefore eat the whole tax
in between
where either or both
demand and supply can adjust
quantity sold will fall
and the tax burden
will be shared between
oilers and users
depending on their respective tapers
whats the washpost's probable brake out...
-----------------
" producers would
pay perhaps a quarter
of the energy tax
with consumers picking up
the balance"
-------- why a quarter ???
sorry mates
beyond
the plain geometry
in your old
frosh micro text
this gets down to very precise
metrics
at any rate
here's the trigger puller.... -----
" they would be getting
Saudi Arabia's help
in rebuilding the nation's finances"
------------ there's a carteresque finale ....--------------
" And really
how painful would it be....
a bit less energy
once the initial
lifestyle adjustments
are made?
Is it really so terrible ?"
----------" err
correction... correction
doc priggles here
there's the little matter of the
actual income
expended
paying
this " near weightless" gas tax
surely that
implies
any budget constrained household
can now buy
' a little bit less
of everything else '
thats a sacrficed too
is it not
senior Ink -Gent ??
unless u intend to off set
with an equal tax cut else where
like i saw one prog pushing
a cut in SSI payroll taxes
with the gas tax rev pouring
into the trust funds as
a dollar for dollar replacement --------
Posted by pinky at September 29, 2005 06:14 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)