my latest
two questions
to my
stand up guy
insta pundit
"answer yes or no.....
===================================
1) " the college of central bankers "
has the capability to sustain
a very majestic
slow
time comsuming
ruffle and roil min
dollar
adjustment?
despite
unbounded
n plus (% of gdp)
external payment deficits
and wildly craven
private speculationary activity ????
2 ) if so
if the CBers
can weather and prevail
why would they ever
be motivated to act
in any other way????
-------------------------------
the answer:
" 1) -- not sure.
depends as you note
on degree of private activity "
------ he gives some numbers ...-----
"there are something like
$10 trillion debt claims
on the US
and $ 7
trillion are private "
"the US needs $800 b
of new financing a year"
"if a big fraction
of private speculators
got convinced the central bankers
could not hold the fort
and started to pull their funds
out of the usa.....
they would put
a lot of pressure
on the bankers"
2) " everything has a cost"
"buying high and selling low
is usually not
a winning strategy"
" and that is what
a lot of central bankers
are doing"
"plus
there are domestic monetary implications
of massive reserve
accumulation"
"to turn it around
if using the central bank
to provide an export subsidy
to
your exporters
is a such a no brainer
winning strategy
why didn't
more people
do it before now?
" there is something very new
about $500-600 b of global
reserve accumulation"
"cheers"
-------------------------------------
Posted by pinky at September 24, 2005 01:12 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)