"100 thousand units per day "
thats the un's estimate
of new urban housing
we earthlings
need to be building .....
starting today
if we want to hold back the slum tides
catch:
this UN Rx
calls
for doin it all
the hard way
full of private
rents and interests
======================================
" A new report by the United
Nations
warns that
governments
will have to take
the lead .....
in building some
100,000 housing units
per day
if the world hopes
to avert a
massive urban crisis
in the near future"
-------clear enough for ya ????
but soft
read what "lead" means -------------
" the report explores the
challenges of ...
achieving
a significant improvement
in the lives
of at least
100 million slum dwellers by 2020"
---------- 100 mill sound like a lot ????----------
"Almost half of the world's
six billion people
already live in
cities Of these,
it is estimated
that
about a third live in
slums"
-------------
some school boy math...
1/2 x 6 bills = 3 bills
3 bills x 1/3 = 1 bill
i billion slum dwellers
now
100 mill/ 1 bill = 10%
10% DE-slummed ....
in 15 years ????
cheesey bushonian goal eh ?------------------
--------------------------------------------
"by
recent estimates,
more than two billion people
will be added
to the number of city dwellers
in developing countries
by
2030"
----------
lets see
keeping slum rates constant....
that projects out as....
1/3 x 2 bills =
~ 650 mill
650 mill
freshly minted
slum-bells
by 2030
and a grand total
of 1,650 million
" gay 30's "
dark urban hellers -------------------
" To meet the needs
of that additional population
some
35 million new housing units
would have to be built every
year for the next 25 years"
----------
note :
35 mill x 25 years = ~ 850 mill units
take the 650 news add the 100 mill interum goal
you get 750
leaving 100 mill
to grow on
and also
35 mill / 365 = ~ 100 k
hence the 100k per day gig --------------
---------- current contradiction --------------
"affordable shelter
is inadequate
and adequate shelter
is unaffordable",
------------------ question
with answer too obvious ...
mounting rates
of urban homeless
what groups benefit ??--------------
--- so how do states -------------
" mobilize
the financial resources
necessary for
both slum upgrading
and further slum prevention"
-----------
before we proceed
down illusary avenues
the report
claims third rate gubmints
ain't got any urban planning
agencies
worth a shit
so how they gonna ...do ....
so upshot whatever might be
won't be
"are u dickin me ??? pal "
------------
"The report also highlights
the strengths and limitations
of
current trends
in conventional mortgage financing"
---------- here comes
the fish fry
UN Rx :
privatize the rewardsand
socialize
the risks thru gubmint
guarantees
yes
the new brighter
UN bureaucracy
is
opposed to
directly
produced
publicly financed
housing projects
let alone publicly
owned and operated projects
our world viewers
are
now
neo gliberal
all the way to the bottom ----------
" right now
the poor
are generally excluded"
-----
used to be ...
banks only
lent money to
folks who don't need it
as harry truman
loved to say
but now
with the gubmint backin em
socializing the risk
while keepin
the reward
a private affair
nice gig
so
look to a it spreadin
to third world addresses
at least at the upper lower levels
roughlydown to
where amerikan blacks
now float here at home
after some skipped
blah blah blahs
that soars
from here to
fatuity ....
we get -------------
"
it is in the interests
of
governments
to extend mortgage markets
down the income scale"
------------- lovely noition that gubmint's
have "interests"
is this general welfare
or a whip hand class interest ????------------
" home ownership is beneficial
economically, socially
and
politically"
---------
now there's line drawn
in the klass sand
and our prior
query is answeredtoo
the interest
refered to as the gubmints
is indeed
that of
the whip hand class ....
one needn't recall
the line
a home of one's own
makes a job worker
a boss fearer
----------
----------------------------------------------
---------- but what of the really poor ---------------
"The majority
of urban poor households
can only afford to
build their homes
in stages
as financial resources become
available "
--------------
not quite sure
whats meant here
by
stages
a shanty built room by room ???
whatever
it is it's sure
not high rise shit
their refering to ----------
--------- so if you want
legal non squat shanties
ie landlord rent
or land owner comp
then the zyztem
needs to generate
scads of -----------
" short-term small loans
of one to
eight years
in amounts from 500
to 5,000 dollars"
--------------
from the finance side
nothing
sinister here...
quite
yet anyway
after all
just capture
all
the negative
scale effects ...
when you loan
in such small packets
no matter the size
u got
up front lender
"origination costs'
sure u can shorten the process
but not anyway near
in proportion
as the face value
of the loan shrinks
so
looked at
per dollar lent
these loans...
well
they need higher
"gross returns "
and then as the pay back flows in
u got
fixed admin costs
which again aren't in proportion ......
etc etc etc ...
this translates
sans rube gubmint sucker floats
and subsidies
very
very high real
interest rates
and that's
forgetting
residual default risks
that might remain un socialized
by the gubminters
"costs a lot
to shylock
these dirty little buggers"
and so
why bother
unless you plan on
running a nice thick scam
off the gubmint
lets continue ....
-------------------
"It is also important to
'increase the number of lenders
in the
housing microfinance sector'"
-------------
as above implies
such low return shakey credits
make for
minimal market participation
because too risky too dirty
too low a return too blah blah blah
too fucked
that is
unless
gubmint
wades in
as big time patsy
question
why not
just let the gubmint do it all then ???
enter the neoliberal enlightenment .....
but first more fill pot .... -------------
" GOVERNMENT
Guarantees are
a mechanism for broadening
the appeal of microfinance
institutions
to lenders "
-------- because??
(heres thrice made point again)
...-----
"the cost of a
typical first world
house is
between 2.5 and six times
the average
annual salary
butt
that ratio rises
to about 10 times
in most
developing countries"
---------whaich translate to one word
default risk
that and
small potatos
as in
low absolute lot values
---------
----jumping around to another dimension ------
"Among the main challenges,
especially in developing
countries with economies
in
transition:
low levels of domestic savings"
---------- this be
the usual elitest
stink bomb
which boils down to just another
meaningless
cat after own tail
tale
the poor are poor
ultimately because
they don't save enough
why
don't they save enough ?
too poor ...
qed
-------
-------------------------
------ whats not stated
here
is the rock hard
fact
if you can debt hook em .....
poor as they be
and i mean
something
like a jobster
household
load em on debt
get em
offering the heffi
too many job hours
and
if they get a job
get em
working
longer harder and better
why ?
cause they gotta
"pay the man"
or lose the hut
yup
longer harder and better
then they ever would
if they were poor
but
"free and clear"
by the way
the third world
"saving klass"
does
save
but too often
especially in a pinch
over seas
in safe first world banks ------------------------
-----how's this
for a feather brained add on ....------------
"there is a need
for accelerated employment
and income generation"
------------get it???
more jobs
more job income
more income
more mortgage payment potential
more payment potential
more house buying
so lets get us some
more better paying jobs
'round here
pronto...
jesus if that dial can be turned up
at gubmint will
why bother about any others
fact:
that dial...
can't be twisted up
even the length of a
flea's penis
at least
not
by any third world gubmint
acting solely on its own ....credit
so what impudent ass
added that
supplementary Rx ...????
professor DODASH Bose of the
BY GALLY BENGALI
gliberal
BRAIN TRUST -------
"a shift of the public sector
away from direct
housing construction
towards assistance
for home ownership
through direct subsidies"
---------- see see
where this heads
behold
the galloping
the jack ass cavalry
hee haw hee haw ----------------------
-------- the report's
got one thing right
for damn sure ---------------
"adequate shelter will
not emerge on its own"
=====================================================
Posted by pinky at September 18, 2005 02:42 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)