READ THIS "An authentic debate might start by asking heretical questions: Why does the United States suffer from perennial trade deficits? Why do new trade agreements, always leave the United States in a deeper deficit hole, and with another wave of jobs moving overseas? How do the authorities explain the 30-year stagnation of working-class wages ? " want greiders answers.....? ============================= well he has none worth more then a pile of moose shit he's a well meaning stoop nagle but he's able to write in code and out of code that its all about exportation of surplus wall street capital but even though he does sorta knowwhats up that the global trade system is rigged amerika's way however he acts aesopian to keep getting paid one guesses stuff like "Washington defines ...." amerika's "...interest primarily in terms of advancing the global reach of our multinational enterprises..." " The distinctive power of America's globalized companies is reflected in our trade patterns" ------- correction bill: our investment patterns ------------ ".... Nearly half of American exports and imports are not traded in open markets but within the companies themselves moving materials and components back and forth among their far-flung factories..." and then he can add this nice bit... "trade deficits don't show on company balance sheets only on nation's" -----ie amerika's -------- "but seriously folks" bill don't get the full game here he sez if washington don't stop being buyer of last resort we'll all face an eventual global crisis and one guesses that will be followed by a protracted deep earthwide depression well since he knows uncle's played big loser for years and since he must know some " first world nations" run persistent trade surpluses then don't it follow others must run equal and off setting deficits so what does he want a system of revolving losers passing the deficits around ? made out of which states ? surely he knows it can't be build off a list of low credit third raters so if its got to be first raters taking turns.... who ? remember there's no "okay nips its your turn to run a deficit" they can make their surplus stick so who ? what crowd of first rate smaller nations is big enough to pass a 300 billion dollar trade deficit back and forth with uncle france britain italy spain ? they're now all tied into the euro zone then the euro zoners what? how you gonna get that past mister grumpy "got a run a trade surplus" hardon germany ? so the works cut out for ya bill ------------------ but shit ehhh.. as bill himself writes this washington rig works .... "real well for our multi national companies and investors..." but he adds perplexedly "this can't last" can't it ? why one guesses he figures uncle has a fore seeable external credit limit so beyond the glum fact the set up already don't work " so well ...." for us purely domestic types soon when it hits the fan the global system won't work well for any one any one any where at all to which i give my standard back stop counter "who told u leading wall street plutocrats hated the depth and darkness of the 30's ?" ---------------------------- oh bill shows his heart's with the correct klass in fact he splits his pants boo hooing over the trend in lower half yankee doodle wages after saying that trend is an obvious big down side part of the present wall street set up as in exports of capital = exports of jobs fair enough only okay now what ? so he tosses a few boston cream pies at us like " unfettered unionization.... tit for tat trade barriers that oughta boost wages..." ya and wouldn't that be grand then coming to his senses he ends thusly : "to describe the consequences of technically feasible remedies like these is to explain why none are likely " ------and even nicer he adds why ...--------- " The webs of mutual interests connecting washington and Wall Street are too deeply woven" ------------------ " okay then eve if greider admits he's dreaming of fairy dust what is a plausible remedy ?" well they're all local non global and very old fashion..... national liberations and SOCIAL REVOLUTIONS =========================================Posted by pinky at July 23, 2005 04:32 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)