heres a pair
of dim dames
hacking
" a few unconected pieces
into a anti weeble feast scold "
======================================
==========================
nyt op ed april 27 2005
"Washington
OVER the last two years
the value of the dollar
against the major currencies
has dropped by more than 25 percent
so
why haven't we seen
a narrowing of the trade deficit
now hitting
new monthly records at $61 billion?
wheres evidence of "expenditure switching":
as the cost of imports rise
Americans should start
seeing imports prices rise too
and buy
more goods made at home;
in turn, our exports
become the foreign currencies
no produce
more dollars
foreigners
oughta see
prices for american exports
drop
which means foreign demand
for our products should rise
-------------- unfortunately
This shift
in exchange rates
hasn't led
to the
price changes
and until they do
the country's trade deficit
will go on uncorrected ---------------
other then oil
our imports have not become
that much more expensive
One reason
about 30 percent
of our imports
come from countries
whose currencies
have either
moved little (the Thai baht)
stayed stable (the Chinese yuan)
or
actually fallen (the Mexican peso)
against the dollar
------------ no no talk to us about the other 70 % -----------------
But theres
another reason
the worldwide decline
during the 1990's
of "pass-through rates":
that is, the rate
at which changes
in the exchange rate
induce changes
in a country's
import and export prices
the price response
to say
A 10 percent change
in the dollar
over the past
two exchange cycles
has induced
only
a 2.5 %
change
in American import prices
within the first quarter
and at best
only a 4 percent
price change
even after
a year
----------- now
theres some good reporting
pub-ed on this is near zero
---------------------
and this time around
one study by the Federal Reserve
found that
the pass-through rate
has been " nearly zero"
Indeed
in the case of the Japanese yen
even a 25 percent rise
in the yen to dollar rate
has generated little if any
increase in the price
we pay for Japanese goods
----------- how about them nips
can't touch em
when it comes to eatin the grenade.......
by the way
we do
nothin
on our end...
cuttin export prices?
forget about it ....
but hey thats us
US is us right?
thats our bottom line
eerrr
well
well
us as corporate US
its US's bottom line
anyway -------------------
Several factors
help explain America's
low pass-through rate
Reduced inflation
around the world
has made prices less volatile
enabling exporters
to ride out currency fluctuations
without changing prices
---------- WHAT
HERE IS A DONKEY STOMP
SENSE HAS BEEN EVACUATED HERE
IF SAW TOOTHIN HAS A TREND
IT WILL BE OBSERVED AND ACTIONS TAKEN
BESIDES CAUSE AND EFFECT ARE HERE CONFLATED
AND AND
OH THIS IS A FOOLS STEW
I'M NOT GOIN TO TRY TO PARSE IT OUT ...===========
As the United States
imports more consumer goods
(which have a lower pass-through rate
compared with commodities)
---HERE IT COMES
WE PIGGY HOUSEHOLDERS ARE THE CULPRITS
NOT CORPORATE B TO B FORIEGN INPUTS
WE ARE MARKET SLIUGS NOT MOVED
FAST ENOUGH BY PRICE CHANGES ----------
-----HERES THE REAL DEAL -----------
exporters don't want to risk
losing market share
in the large and competitive
American market
even if that means
decreasing their own profit margins
to keep prices stable
in the United States
--- BUT ON THE OTHER SIDE
AMERICAN EXPORTERS PREFER TO EARN HIGHER DOLLAR RETURNS THEN TPO TRY EXPANDING THEIR FOREIGN MARKET SHARE
AGIN THEIR FOREIGN OLIGOPS
SO ON BOTH ENDS
THE IM EX GAP DON'T GET CLOSED-----------------
Low pass-through means
that Americans have not yet
lost their purchasing power abroad
despite the dollar depreciation
and therefore we can continue
to enjoy living
beyond our means
------------- SEE ITS US PIGGY POOS FAULT -----------
Over the long run
though
the enormous trade imbalance
is not sustainable
------------------- MAYBE BUT WHY ?
WORLD HAS NO IMPERIAL WIN WINS?
THATS BULL ----------------
Low pass-through means
that it will take
a much bigger drop
in the dollar
to change prices enough
to induce switching
and correct the trade deficit
--------- BIGGER OR JUST LONGER
IN FACT MIGHT NOT A LITTLE PATIENCE BE IN ORDER HERE
NOT FURTHER EXCHANGE DROP Rxs--------------------
In fact
between the depreciation of the dollar
and the loss in spending power
this adjustment could end up
costing every American $2,350
The larger
the eventual depreciation
and the longer we wait
the greater our postponed
pain promises to be
---------------- be scared and ashamed piggy poo
corporate amerika can only do o much
if we can't restrain our gluttony --------------
Catherine L. Mann is a senior fellow
and Katharina Plück
is a research assistant
at the Institute for International Economic
ie
wally world
poop eaters
Posted by pinky at April 28, 2005 12:22 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)