with the stalinoids in his sights
sand
perhaps
thinking
of the incredible longevity
of
that
feudal totalitarian contrivence
the catholic church
and maybe more specifically
of
its wildly successful
medieval monastic system
george
" the first duke of orwell"
wrote in '48
"the most durable social formations
all collectivize their exploitation
system ...."
okay george
so
what went wrong
with the soviet set up ?
=============================================
why didn't this collective
system of exploitation
spell
"fearsomely stellar"
indurance prospects
for
the globe's commie systems?
why was bakunin's curse
the dreaded red bureaucracy
not
uber alles
it surveyed
fer eternity plus ?
-----------------------------------------
first off
before we get into this shit
i gotta mention
we're skipping
right over
"the really bigger question"
here
the problematic assertion
eric the black
finessed as self evident
i.e.
that
"stalinist state capitalism "
is a system of exploitation
albeit of a new type
and as a system of exploitation
no step forward
at all
in fact
from high up there
on his freedom purch
"it"
looked like
a step backward
well
as much as i'd like to smack this around some
we must leave
it alone
leave it be
to simmer in its own
smarmy assumptions
un catabolized
leave the stinker
as is
for now......
and permit
the woeful legion
of
romantic pluralists
to continue
their 24/7 mope
"leave them dear boy
to in their accustonmed funkery"
pecksniff
and jump to george's lemma
given the institution
of a system
of collective exploitation
it wil prove
exceedingly
long lasting
------------------------------------------------------
face it
hittin
this scare ball
into the parking lot
is enough for one post
considering
the extra helpings of gloom
it produced
in go goo pb minds
for dozens and dozens
of post war years
-----------------------------------------------
( by the way
why
were they so pessimistic...?
seemingly
the cuffs
didn't actually believe
in the reality
of their own creed)
---------------------------------------
pluralization
is
not just a swell idea
but
an actual essential
social process ....
---------------------------------------
"looked at dialectically....
(as my great aunt
would say)
state parties
develop
like everything else
they start to split apart"
one becomes two
recall
lenin's
off hand press prophecy
of an eventual
soviet return to
a two party set up...
" a left bolshy party
vs
a right bolshy party "
but
what happens
when this is about
to come true
what happens? "
---------------------------------------------------------------------
especially since fuck
a two inner state- party
set up )
can't possibly
both peacefully
co -exist
and remain state parties
at least not
inside one state
even one state
totally
of their own erection
so...............
the biforcation leads
first to
a stalin hack up
instead of the emergence
of two parties competing with each other
for state power
a trot party say
and
a bukharin party
cause
at least in round one
the bulk
of the party cadre
see this splitin shit
as jigs up time
so they like the hack
vote for the hack etc etc
so
you get not two parties
not even one party
no
you get
an armless torso
an immobilized
careerist
but shivering apparatus
a top down
stooge-archy
with bully boy knave
as its head
but hey how long can this go on
right?
given the things built right
to begin with
well at least 70 years apparently
but thats no length at all
as epochs go that'a
barely an era
---------------------------------------------
" despite the deadly hammers
and despite the corruptions
the pluality forces
keep up their disintegration effect"
------------------------------------------------
yes
bi polarization
that binary sine qua non
of actual
(contradiction teeming)
social motion
keeps on truckin away
-------------------------------------------------------------
" pluralization"
real pluralization
is
a built in result
of any social formations
necessary dynamics
-------------------------------------------------------
the micro- cracking of the superstructure
and
the state party
not able to
macro split
none the less
micro splits
a one off split here ....
a one off split there .....
this of course
is hardly
the gliberal gay mens chorus
version
of pluralism
no
its not
that fucking tedious
choiceful static but
bountifully diverse
pb picnic basket
-------------------------------------------------------------
once
this microscopic
force- counter force
goes on
every where long enough
" heaving the status quo apart"
god love it
events can culminates
only one way
in an abrupt
and i do mean
abrupt
totally shattering
totally disintegrating
climax collapse
--------------------------------------------
so much for thousand year states
----------------------------------------------
using hegel's
60 year
unit scale
for marking off time
at the level
of world history
no present day
concrete slab
of a party/state totality
will ever last
even two full units
thats the law kids
there's an '89
waiting out there
for every '17
---------------------------------------
and here we are today
in a serious post '89
i guess
if yer a pb
well
happy days
are
here again
or were agian....
the 90's being prolly
as good as it's gonna get
for you squirts
like moss
in this stage of the klass struggle
you're moments
come only
the shady
down side
of cleo's complex
of sine waves
so if clinton wasn't
paradise
get used to it
for u
things aren't gonna
get kooler
anytime soon
yes suddenly its '89
the pb wall crumbles
and
you plebheaded fuckers
are free
to buzz around
in all directions ...
at least all directions
that obey both the lower laws of value
and the higher dictates of wall street
--------------------------------
sorry shit face
but
the 90's were your gay days
now yer gettin bush milled
and who can say how much nastier
your here afters will be....
---------------------------------------------
now if yer not a pleb head
if yer a prole cat
well look sharp
stand up
tie yer laces
get ready
the next '17 pard
is already
cookin in the oven
right now
its as sure a bet now
as the last '89
was in
well '46
or
even '68
for that matter
so get crackin
we have a god fuckin
whole new world to win
or
is it win back?
=================================================
Posted by pinky at April 24, 2005 10:01 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)