eve has a few
self organizung
planks
to throw down
below
my wealth tax:
=======================
whats the use
of a real
after inflation adjusted
rate of interest ?
is it a guide?
need it be positive ?
what dtermines its long run path ?
nice questions
to know an answer to
if you want to topple wall street
but today lets just
try answering
a side show question
why not make
the rentier game
zero sum?
ie tax away
the risk min
real rate of interest
----------------
right off the bat:
when
paid out
to a pure rentier
a
real rate of return
(one adjusted for inflation)
on capital
lent to uncle sam
is
a rip off for sure
as pink here himself
once wrote
"interest income
from a bundle of T bonds
flowing to me as
a trust fund
radical rentier
is merely
my winnings
as
a dumb lucky
born into the right household
ticket holder"
from
'kill all rentiers'
by comrade
paine (mayday 1979 )
-------------- indeed ------------------
" the real rate of interest
over time
reflects rather well
the movements
of real rate
of average growth
in
labor's social productivity.......
the expropriation of some or all
of this growth
by capital
obviously keeps the interest rate
different and the ratio between them in motion "
pinkerton p paine
'capital markets offended'
october 28 1979
---------- rather a mouth full
but nearly correct .... --------------------
----------------
in short
start off by
thinking
in labor hours
" money on hand
at any given time
is an entitlement
right then and there
to so many
socially necesssary labor hours
embodied
in any market availible
useful product "
pandora paines
" notes on product markets "1999
--------------------------------------
heres a poser
if i put my money aside
and sleep for twenty years
when i wake up
whats fair game?
should i get the same products
in exchange
as i would have back when?
or now twenty years later
given
the change in output
per hour of labor
should i get to exchange
at the new more products per rate ?
to me this is obviously not worth answering
but in reality
if 20 years back
i'd put my dollars
in a bond fund ira
i'd prolly at least get the new average
right ?
why ?
cause
its possible
its pro burger - cap
and
since
this is a burger set up
we got it baby !!!!!!!!!
and all this
while still
wagering the hands enough
to keep em comin back
in large enough numbers
to keep em down
this
alows the system
to reward her goatish enterprisers
for their above average
labor saving innovations
and keep the sheepish rentiers
in a level field of clover
---------------------------------
to jump ahead before my horse dies...
rentiers are like
the mystery meat
version
of
todays SSI beneficiaries
over all
their T bond bound
capital stock
(SSI VIRTUAL ANNUITY )
gets adjusted
to the new higher
productivity
per
hour of social labor
-------------------------------------
NOW WE COULD TAX THIS AWAY
OF COURSE
FORCE THE RENTIERS TO MAKE IT
FROM HERE
ON ONLY RISK AND INFLATION
ADJUSTED SAVINGS ALONE
NO PRODUCTIVITY INDEX
HEY THATS WHAT GREENBALLS WANTS
TO DO FOR THE 18-55 WAGERY RIGHT
CUT THE PRODUCTIVITY INDEX OUT OF THEIR
FUTURE SSS PAYMENTS ?
Posted by pinky at April 22, 2005 01:03 AM
Posted by: WISE ACRE at April 22, 2005 02:13 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)