seems
" hackademic scholars
now agree
over the last 30 years
the individual lines
of household income
have
grown more restless
more choppy
more...treacherous
so the question gets asked....
how many
in our vast fleet
of tiny familly arks
can safely say
"no matter what comes
"we "
can weather the tempests....
all by our selves"
============================================
NYT march 20 2005:
by Daniel Gross
------------------------------------------
" scholars ( sic)
have concluded
that incomes are much less stable
today than they have been in the past"
best availible estimates:
" household income volatility
has been increasing
since at least 1975.....
it accelerated in the 1980's
turned down some
in the early 1990's
and then accelerated again
towards
the end of the 1990's "
----------------------------------------
" According to
"the Hacker volatility index"
over all household income
volatility
rose 88 percent
between 1975 and 2000"
-------------------------------------------------------
The further problem :
" while volatility has risen
real incomes haven't risen"
and whats more
"this volatility has grown faster
for those who can afford it least"
----------------------------------------------
" in the 1970's
income for middle-class Americans
tended to fluctuate
by 16 percent
a year
But in the 1980's and 1990's
middle-class incomes
fluctuated
an average
of 30 percent"
" For those whose earnings
placed them
in the bottom fifth
income volatility
rose
from 25 percent
in the early 1970's
to
50 percent
in recent years"
-------------
note:
do you share my wonder
at
how a household gets
defined
into one or other quintile?
in a properly longitudinal study
this is serious
my guess
here
its
" starting household income
(the income at the beginning of the study period )
that defines
a households study quintile
once and for all
its where the household starts
that
what makes a household
middle or lowest etc
and
after they start
their journey through the observation period
their free
to
criss-crossing quintile lines
like crazy
without a label change
on second thought
picking any year
at random would work just as well
prolly
the volatility of the volatility
by changing honest labeling methods
gets to be tiny
but my intuition
is like my singing pitch....
shitful ----------------------
-----------that not being enough
there's more grim-ery ....
"the familly's nut"
these days
takes a bigger bite ...:----------------
" fixed household commitments
have risen
as a percentage
of total income....
the typical American household
in the early 1970's spent
about
54 percent
of its income
on big fixed expenses
- home mortgage, health insurance, car, child care -
with the rest left over for discretionary spending.
By the early part of this decade
however, the typical family
was spending
75 percent
of its income
on these large fixed costs"
and
factors that functioned
as internal shock absorbers
have weakened
---------- under pressure
household
offer up to the job market
more of their hours
butt fuck
now that two jobs per household
is the norm
where's are the availible
surplus hours gonna come from?-------------
external buffers?
they've
shrunk too
" Over the last three decades,
the percentage of workers
covered by defined-benefit pension plans
and employer-provided health insurance
has declined"
--------------------------------------
ray of sun shine....
" Social Security provides
a vital kind of insurance"
however here comes the heffalump
"The real issue' sez Hacker
"lurking behind this republican effort
is whether we should even have
a program like SSI...
a program
that provides
bedrock protection
against economic risk."
-----------------------
ps paine and abel
need to build us a nice model
forth this eh?
----------------------------------------
==============================================================
Posted by pinky at March 21, 2005 06:36 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)