the role of uncle
as spender of last resort
has its win win side
and its hardly all con
to ask
" how much bigger should
uncle's foreign trade deficit be
if we want a better world ?"
=====================================
our popular press on this
has not been very good
seems
on a bigger stage
we're sort of
where federal deficit policy
press talk
was
prior to
say
the "new fronteer" tax cut
when keynes' kids finaly
managed
to force
the eliter elements in the media
to "get "
the "full throttle" multiplier notion
of course
the scientific brake thru
and its obviuos policy consequences
goes all the way back to the 1930's
back to the total
system failure
and human horrors
of the world's
last great depression
still and all
like male homosexuality
the mass press really
pretended not to notice
today we have a similar blind eye set up
the lessons
of the sovereign deficit
win win
are hardly
allowed to get injected
into the popular blood stream
especially
here in the land of the free
----------------------------------------------
and this
despite the million
or so young americans
who take college macro 101
each year
at the freshman level
keynes has a far harder slog then darwin !
---------------------------------------------
but putting aside
the ironies
of klass over klass policy wars
and simply
looking at the science of it all
one can ask
about uncle's fiscal deficit
how big
is big enough ?
thats is
to make
the whole world's production system
run at full throttle ?
-------------------------------------------------
well first off
there's a flaw
we need to clear up
to continue our earlier
analogy
the usa = the globe
world wide speaking
its all to plain
uncle is more like
an over grown california
then
a true federal authority
first among nations
but not
a world government
so what we're
talking about here
is as if california
tried running
a huge state budget deficit
to lift
the entire national employment level
up closer
to its full throttle point
see folks ?
since
there ain't
no" global" government
with taxing power
next best iz
is the world's economically
biggest constituent nation
but shit
even uncle
as big balled as he iz
remains
a highly
imperfect substitute
for "the real thing"
a global government
with global
tax and spend power
to see just how crimping this is
one only needs notice
that its only uncle's
import multiplier
that is
an effective engine globally
if by increasing
the fed deficit
one did not increase imports
the outside world would not benefit
economically by the policy even one iota
as uncle ups his fiscal deficit
its only as that demand increase
ramifies
thru to import increases
that the globe at large
grows faster
and this don't even touch
distribution uneven-ness
------------------------------
problem:
as old bob mundell use to say
"the globe's
a closed system
so multipliers work perfectly
no leakages
but guys
we are all
local taxers
and so limited
by our one state capacities "
------------------------------------------
but imperfect as it surely iz
whats the deal?
ok
FIRST WE'll NEED
roughly QUANTITATIVE ANSWERS
TO SOME QUESTIONS
LIKE
WHATS THE WORLDS ACTUAL GROSS PRODUCT?
(much harder question)
WHATS THE WORLD'S FULL CAPACITY GROSS PRODUCT ?
WITH THIS WE GET A CALC
OF THE WORLD PRODUCTION GAP
NOW WE NEED TO KNOW
WHAT ADDITIONAL DEMAND
IS NEEDED TO CLOSE THE OUT PUT GAP ?
SINCE ITS UNCLE
WHO'S DESIGNATED BIG SPENDER
WHATS THE EFFECT OF
UNCLE'S
FISCAL DEFICIT INCREASE ON
HIS IMPORTS ?
AND WHATS THE EFFECT OF
UNCLES ADDED IMPORTS
ON THE REST OF THE WORLDS GROWTH PATH ?
CAN UNCLE BORROW ALL HE NEEDS
TO RAISE THE WORLD TO FULL OUT PUT ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
looked at by
the comparative wealth of nations
is it trickle down economics ?
yes indeed
and with a vengence
the richest nation
gets to live higher
cause it indirectly creates
some additional third world jobs
YES
OF COURSE
THE WORLD COULD
WELL CONSTRUCT ON PAPER
A FAR FAR FAIRER
MORE EFFICIENT
AND BETTER SET UP
TO REGULATE ITS OUT PUT LEVEL
AS AN EXAMPLE
OLD STIG HAS GUSHED FOR YEARS
ABOUT
A CBers only reserve currency SYSTEM
WITH A GLOBAL CENTER
that could dole
out sovereign credits
to member nations
and of course
this could well serve
to maintain
world effective demand
at full throttle levels
but my point is simple
don't imagine uncle's
deep pockets
sovereign dollar driven
world supplied
" free ride"
actually costs
the rest of the world
"dollar for dollar"
in real terms
what they lend him
in fact if anything
a huge chunk
of it
comes
right out of
the globe's ample
"idle hours budget "
---------------------------------------------------------
by the way
how you like our control
of the one world army ?
its budget equals 600 billion too
just whatwe boorrow
from the 4 aces
yes
the east asians
lent us the dollars
to pay for uncles armada
and then some
quid pro quo ?
uncle secures
"their" oil supply lines
and
robusticates
their
export markets
good deal ?
right ..............
====================================================
Posted by pinky at December 6, 2004 04:50 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)