go into this cess pool
clutching
one over arching fact
a policy punted
plunging dollar
kills two birds
the euro corporatists
and their fricking
social market rigging
and
the han bankers
with their
too dirt cheap
yuanulation
================================
The US dollar is set to continue
its fall on money markets
around the world
following the meeting
of central bankers
and finance ministers
of the Group of 20 (G20)
held in Berlin over the weekend.
--------- you bet buster
full drop speed ahead!-----------------
While the fall of the dollar
has been one of the main topics
of discussion in banking
and financial circles
over the past months,
it was not on the agenda
at the meeting
because
of disagreements
between the US and Europeans
-----what about sony?---------------
While the European powers
are concerned that the falling dollar
will hit their exports,
------ lets hope it does -------------
resulting in slower economic growth
there
--------- all else being equal
which it won't be
if the euro's can off their fiscal deficit straight jacket -----------------
the US is insisting
that no co-ordinated action
need be taken on exchange rates
------ right every one knows where its headed
and the euros don't want to stop it
or they would have yuanified the euro
but can't say that in public
cause that means you don't give
a shit about the valuegrowth
of your sovereign portfolio ---------------
and that they should be
determined by market forces.
------ love this
are the currrency ratios
CB managed
or market dominated
and really unmanageable
u get a relentless
back and forth
tick tock on that one
often in the same article----------
The Europeans maintain
that the falling dollar
is caused by the record
US fiscal and balance of payments deficits
and that the Bush administration
should put its economic house in order.
------- do u think little george's boys don't know that ?---------
The US, on the other hand,
declares that the imbalances
in the world economy,
reflected in the US deficits,
are caused by low European growth rates
------- ie elementary shit
if the euro economy grew faster
no matter its current speed
it would pullin more imports without adding to exports the knock here is slower euro growth causes a surging us economy to run deficits :
true -----------
which need to be overcome
through “restructuring”
and greater scope
for the operation of “market forces”.
------no a simple dollar fall ought to do the trick
basically each side is chiding the other over a policy
in private they agree
is necessary if euro wagery painful----------------
As a result of the conflicts,
the communiqué which emerged
from the meeting committed
nobody to anything.
“We underscored the importance
of medium-term fiscal consolidation
in the United States,"
-remember attacking uncle's fiscal deficit
know bush is back in
plays into bush's hands
the fiscal crisis
will help reducesocial spending
(-period-)
get it rangers ?
this is pro rastlin
the inter imperial rivalry
has not ripened yet
to where real monetary conflicts
will burst out
into flaming tongues---
------------
structural imbalances
in the US and global economy
have been highlighted
by former US treasury secretary
Lawrence Summers.
In a lecture delivered on October 3,
he noted that running
at more than $600 billion annually
and in the range of 5.5 percent of GDP,
the US current account deficit
represents more than 1 percent
of global GDP
and absorbs almost two-thirds
of the cumulative current account surpluses
of the world’s surplus countries.
------ okay now heres where
a little global close system
macro know what
would help mr beam
thru his horror story
he oughta read
his fellow canadian nobel laureate
bob mundel
(bob was one of my teachers
though i must confess
i knew him in his golden gold brick
"bullion bob" years
not when he was still doing
front line small country open macro work
no by my era
he 'd gone seriously soft in the squash)
at any rate
ole bob
used to tell us
"hey some ones got to lose
especially
if there are guys
who insist
the always need to win
and well
better for every one
if the loser be
the richest player
right ?"---------------
Summers explained
that even if the global economy
grew in a balanced way,
with imports and exports rising
in proportion to the size of the global economy
----this is a terribly
miss leading assumption
for normal global dynamics
to work well
the external sector
needs to grow
at least twice
as fast
as the whole system
and it usually does ---------
the US balance of payments deficit
would continue to grow.
This is because US imports
are around 16 percent of GDP
while exports stand at 11 percent.
----- this is a garble
some other hidden assumption is necessary here
is he saying
he assumes
us export share is also constant
i hope not thats idiocy and tautology ---------
Furthermore,
the US has a higher propensity
to import than its trading partners
------ yes but thats an artefact
of its global big spender of last resort role
seen now mostly in our insane han-nip shit buying ----------
This means that even if the US
and its trading partners grow
at the same rate,
US imports will increase
at a faster rate than exports,
thereby widening
the balance of payments deficit
------ right so what else?
ya punt the buck dick
and thus change the dynamics ------------
Noting the increasing role
of the East Asian central banks
in financing the US deficit
—they currently hold
around $1.8 trillion
in foreign currency reserves
—Summers drew attention
to what he has previously
described as
the “balance of financial terror”
-this summers kat is wall street bobby rubins ass hole buddy
and a real live ivy league cock sucker ----------
On the one hand the US depends
on an ever-larger inflow
from the Asian banks
to finance its deficit
while on the other the lenders,
despite incurring losses
on their investment
and exposing themselves
to greater financial risk
are afraid to withdraw
their funds lest they set off
a financial crisis.
------- yes a quid pro quo
that is neither balanced or terrifying ------------
--------------------------------
global financial
conflicts appear
to be deepening.
In an analysis of the G20 meeting,
an article
in the Australian Financial Review
noted:
“Squabbling at the weekend’s
G20 finance ministers’
meeting and unusually candid comments
from ... Alan Greenspan can only mean one thing:
America’s unilateralism under
President George Bush
has extended beyond foreign policy
to economic policy.
--------total none sense
just read summers above this is a dynamic grapple
both sides push at each other
but no one wants the dealings to end
or they'd simply walk away
thats unilateralism
by the way
trade can never be unilateral
of course not
buying without selling or selling without buying
requires credit
there is no question
credit polcy
unlike trade policy
can get away with
one sided -ness
possible unilateral action
in fact is the heart
of
investment and credit ----------
Having lost hope that market-opening
reforms on Europe and Japan
that will boost exports
and reduce its current account deficit,
the US is taking matters into its own hands.”
-------- no it can't buster
sorry the euro bankers are playin along here
again this is studio rastlin fanz
not for real in any obvious sense ----------
“The US knows what it needs,
and Japan and the Europeans
can moan all they like.”
--this bully boy stuff
plays well down under ----------
---------------------------------
Signs of increased tensions
were clearly in evidence
in the wake of the G20 meeting.
In an interview
with the Financial Times published today,
the deputy governor
of the People’s Bank of China,
Li Ruogu,
made it clear
that China would not be rushed
into revaluing its currency
—a central demand
of both the US and the European powers.
Ruogu warned
the US not to blame other countries
for its economic difficulties.
“China’s custom is that
we never blame others
for our own problem.
For the past 26 years,
we never put pressure
or problems on to the world.
The US has the reverse attitude,
whenever they have a problem,
they blame others,” he said.
---more heel v baby face
bluster for uz geeps -----------
China’s trade surplus
with the US was more than
$120 billion last year
and has been increasing
at a record rate,
rising by more than $15.5 billion
in September
and $15.4 billion in August.
---- time the yuan soared?
like the yen after plaza '85 --------------
The US has been demanding
that this imbalance be addressed
through an upward valuation
of the yuan
and eventually
full currency flexibility.
--part two is agreed to already
and is a straw dog here -------------
But Chinese authorities fear
that if the present regulatory regime
is abandoned too quickly
this will lead to a crisis
in the banking system
where some estimates
put the level of bad loans at 40%
----------- a partial truth
worse then a lie ----------
=======================================
Posted by pinky at December 3, 2004 12:54 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)