November 26, 2004

social fascism redux


i think i like 
the stalinoid expression 
      social fascist

 its like democratic centralism

it squares the circle 

and inside  the  
semantic collision
of the two words 
   rages the wisdom of the dialectic 

==================================


  tweedle dum tweedle dee

  petty burger movements
 all move in the same circle
all stop at the same set 
           of weigh stations 

so what if they morph alot
like worms to butterflies
more of one  
means 
more of the  other 
            in the end 

today its burger democracy 
tomorrow its burger dictatorship
blah blah blah 
round and round to no where 
if you're a patty democrat today
 you'll be a patty fascist tomorrow 
 in side each one of you 
is  the same set 
of comprehensive patty genes 

if when others
 get with it and move on
to the next stage
but you stay put
well 
so what does that prove?

arrested development 
 happens
so what
especially 
 in individual 
extreme cases
-------------------------------------

the cadre 
of the social democratic party
                         of germany
were called 
"social fascists"
by the german communist cadre 

that is 
until they both ended up 
in hitlers trash can

then else where in europe
where it was stil possible
we stalino-reds 
 got into popular fronting

and the social fascist label 
and the main enemy bit  
got dropped

but 
after all
don't it make sense ?

i mean what is next ?

when social democracy
hesitates to press
forward 
 and attack capital head on 

whats next ?

when  they hang fire 
wishful think 
play for consensus 
and 
the situation boils over 
  into  a real 
   social crisis ?

what else

the're routed as fools and bumblers 

and so next if the straight time burger parties
 are massively despised 

yup 
here comes 
hitlers little brown wagon


okay
 now step back

look 
 at  the bigger dynamic scheme of things

whats the diff ?

if a leads to z 

a means z 
by entailment

if you get a
you is gonna 
eventually get z 
 
right ? 

who needs to count the steps
and worship the differences 

whats either of em
anyway
but
 a  pleb headed
romantic 
  re-action 
    to the klass struggle

   a wicked klass detour sign  

a re-action misdirection
of  the wage  workers 

both attempt
to halt 
the community cleaving righteous rage
of the unfettered klass struggle  

one mr A
says lets humanize them
give em manhood rights 
and  
give a little more cake here 
mr cap so you can keep the rest 

by humanizing their life
you'll humanize 
and unify society  
 
but now 
 at the other end
whats so different ?

mr Z sez
lets  
 recruit the wage geeps 
hitch em 
to our national crusade
  
nationalize away 
their klass stand 
swamp their economic difference
                   with same race glory 
-----------------------

okay how polar simple can it get 

one uses equality

the other uses inequality

one uses promises of bread

the other promises of victory  

ones humane
the other  inhumane
one begs the other steals 
--------------------------


    good   vs      evil 

to mr A 

these are everything

goo goo goo 



to mr Z

  mere  words
for weaklings  


ha ha ha ha 

===========================
Posted by pinky at November 26, 2004 07:03 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?