this is about whither globalization and it corporate sponsors can it revert to a stable period of basic dovery? or wil it bristle with inter imperial clashes a clinton esque cartel or a falling out into squabbles that strain the bonds of pax americana =============================== dearest mark hey fella why the muddle about muddle? its really easy first hawk corporate types v dove corporate types bush v kerry thats struggle but its still keepin it inside the familly one nation one klass disagreements i see say bobby rubin on one side and some oily boy's banker on the other "hawk no dove no hawk no dove" ageless tactical questions here about imperial management not" strategical" as our prez might point out the tactics roll in and roll out as imperialism respires hawk dove hawk dove jeff mutt jeff mutt but there's a second set of contadictions between groups that are same klass still butfuck from different big shot nations between groups of transnationals with different "state" home bases when they clash and the clash ends up in hawk hands thats when the real dynamite might get tossed around cause it can lead one national-group that decides fuck it lets use state force to step too hard on the toes of another national-group that wanted "in' too some times if they're both well armed and if they each see a chance to win they end up fighting each other over the loot so when a second groups state steps in to second their claims .... ---------------------------------- that they fight rarely and far more often threaten to fight over loot is evidence not of peace's strenght but of its eventual failure when groups of trans nats are conflicting the story is at its beginning when big shot states howl its building they arm and howl and arm and alliances are worked at till suddenly " there are always doves right up till august 1914 comes round again" josip broz tito ----------------------- yes boring but true imperialism is the armed consequence of too many transnational investment groups chasing too few prospects capital exportis the game (ie the spontaneous transnationalization of corporate investment activity ) and its this not the mere existence of naural resources or cheap labor that causes the conflict after all loans and trade would secure those benes to any and all consumers but the benes of profiteers well some ass hole native type would grab most of that wouldn't he? so off "we" go not to trade not even to lend but to invest directly scoop it all up right there now if the intervening investors can;t help but fall all over each other.. and well elbows fly either one scares off the other or force leads to counter force and this imperial spiral means ultimately "state" armed forces opposing each other and the age of clintoxlike co-operation rings down the peace curtain apon a hapless toiling globe ------------------------------- by the way despite the obvious existence of private corporate armies any fool can see why big "state" armed ops like the iraq topple are simply what happens when a corporate transnational group decides first : " lets not politic this one around anymore lets just get it done the hard way" and as a result because its huge and risky second : "lets call on uncle sam's army and the 270 million little american saps collective credit card " gettin it done "the hawk way is gettin it done the hard way" and it means one best let some ass hole innocent tax base either pay or far more likely sign for the damn thing u generally don't see corporations "privately" picking up high risk 200 billion dollar tabs do ya nuff said i await your reply your the late fabulously wealth j pinkerton paine ====================Posted by pinky at October 23, 2004 04:58 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)