how big is best whats optimal size when it comes to the mass of joblessness the famed " reserve army " ================= obviously theres always both a too much point and a too little point and time and circumstances effect where these dual points rest the safe stable pathway betwixt these two is hardly reducible to an unchanging thumb rule say like keep it around 6 % and your safe nope no such proposal has value cause real conditions change so the path width may vary and even its location meanders over time even like after 29 take a super sharp shift or like after 41 an equally sharp shift back ------------------------- its always a two headed struugle for dominance a klass v klass policy struggle but then social reality does set limits too only not the natural limits the reserve apologists like to lulla bye conscience burgers with -------------------------------- take the old scientifically derived official minimum reserve rate of the 80's and 90's 6 % well as we glided into the high 90's we went right thru 6% with out creating predicted economic nite mare of wage push induced price turbulence turned out descending below the 6 % barrier never caused a ripple in the price level in fact the inflation rate just continued its decceleration ------------------------- so what the fuck was the green grosser up to ? minimal real wage growth perhaps managing for that isn't childs play not with consumer demand management thrown in on top ---------------------------------------- to be continued =============================Posted by pinky at August 28, 2004 05:26 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)